Misplaced Pages

User talk:Natalie Erin: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:01, 6 January 2008 editNatalie Erin (talk | contribs)23,772 edits +← Previous edit Revision as of 00:01, 7 January 2008 edit undoSmith Jones (talk | contribs)5,086 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 62: Line 62:


{{-}} {{-}}

== fine fine whatever ==

ill take it down jeez stop with the hrassment. ] (]) 00:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:01, 7 January 2008

edit count | edit summary usage | logs current status: online
Archiving icon
Archives

through January 2007
through February 2007
through March 2007
through April 2007
through May 2007
through June 2007
through July 2007
through August 2007
through September 2007
through October 2007
through November 2007
through December 2007


Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page. I will respond on your talk page unless otherwise requested. Thanks.

Dates

Hi Natalie, if you don't mark the entire date as a link, the use preferences for the date format do not work, so I've reverted what you did to poor Jayne's death date. (John User:Jwy talk) 01:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Season Greetings


Dear Natalie Erin, on behalf of my snow-buried Canadian region of Ottawa, I would like to wish you a Safe and Happy New Year 2008.
JForget 02:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

tpv2066 tfd of Moron

Thanks for that, I just noticed and didnt scroll back far enough. You just beat me to the punch. Tpv2066 (talk) 02:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Natalie Erin

Wishing you the best for 2008! Acalamari 03:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I had a good New Year, and I hope you did too. Best wishes. :) Acalamari 03:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Ball FO

Why are you reverting that crap? The article itself is a joke. Did you not read the information in the article? Chibi Gohan (talk) 03:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The article itself is a joke. "Dragon Ball FO is the newest, upcoming addition to the Dragon Ball (anime)-series, succeeding Dragon Ball AF. 'FO' means Fuck Off." This article shouldn't exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chibi Gohan (talk • contribs) 03:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

hey it was a mistake i usually sign my commetns okay i just made a mistake that one time. i dont really appreciate all the harassment that goes to me by bots whenever i make a tiny mistake. thank you for your conecern. Smith Jones (talk) 03:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

(Belated) Happy New Year! spam

Here's hoping the new year brings you nothing but the best ;) Fvasconcellos* (t·c) 15:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

The design of this almost completely impersonal (yet hopefully uplifting) message was ripped from Riana (talk · contribs).
Please feel free to archive it whenever you like.

fine fine whatever

ill take it down jeez stop with the hrassment. Smith Jones (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)