| Revision as of 01:46, 5 January 2008 editBolonium (talk | contribs)5,938 edits →Portal:Serbia: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 9 January 2008 edit undoDchall1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,308 edits →Albanians in Serbia: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Hey, I was wondering if you would be interested in adding a few entries to keep this portal updated... (It will automatically change articles every month.) Thanks, --] (]) 01:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | Hey, I was wondering if you would be interested in adding a few entries to keep this portal updated... (It will automatically change articles every month.) Thanks, --] (]) 01:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, I noticed your edits to this and its related articles. I certainly understand the reasoning for combining them into the one article. But this article was created by copy and pasting, and was done without seeking consensus. I also understand that we can't keep all three of the articles - we need either the two seperate ones or the combined article. But if we're going to put them together, we at least need to do a proper merger, and not simply a blank-and-redirect. I don't want to turn this into an edit war so I'm not going to undo your edits, but I'd appreciate it if you would. Thanks! ] (]) 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 9 January 2008
...
.svg)
For no particular reason
Hope you have a good day! Nengscoz416 (talk) 01:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Portal:Serbia
Hey, I was wondering if you would be interested in adding a few entries to keep this portal updated... (It will automatically change articles every month.) Thanks, --Bolonium (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Albanians in Serbia
Hi, I noticed your edits to this and its related articles. I certainly understand the reasoning for combining them into the one article. But this article was created by copy and pasting, and was done without seeking consensus. I also understand that we can't keep all three of the articles - we need either the two seperate ones or the combined article. But if we're going to put them together, we at least need to do a proper merger, and not simply a blank-and-redirect. I don't want to turn this into an edit war so I'm not going to undo your edits, but I'd appreciate it if you would. Thanks! Dchall1 (talk) 04:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)