Revision as of 04:54, 20 January 2008 editArsenic99 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users998 edits →Your Dr. Justin McCarthy edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:54, 20 January 2008 edit undoArsenic99 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users998 edits →Your Dr. Justin McCarthy editNext edit → | ||
Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
I fixed up a couple things on Justin McCarthy, that seemed completely biased. It seems that the Armenian propagandists are trying their best to edit the Justin McCarthy article to make him look like some "nationalistic agenda follower", which is just not right. I thought Misplaced Pages had policies against portraying living person biographies in a negative way. Is anyone even allowed to add "Criticism of his work"? I mean because then you can add criticism of just about anybody. | I fixed up a couple things on Justin McCarthy, that seemed completely biased. It seems that the Armenian propagandists are trying their best to edit the Justin McCarthy article to make him look like some "nationalistic agenda follower", which is just not right. I thought Misplaced Pages had policies against portraying living person biographies in a negative way. Is anyone even allowed to add "Criticism of his work"? I mean because then you can add criticism of just about anybody. | ||
Anyway, I didn't remove anything cited or referenced properly. But be aware that people with Armenian nationalistic agendas are continuously vandalizing that page and semi-vandalizing it to make it seem like Justin McCarthy is some sort of "denialist" or "liar" or "propagandist" when his work is so well supported. | Anyway, I didn't remove anything cited or referenced properly. But be aware that people with Armenian nationalistic agendas are continuously vandalizing that page and semi-vandalizing it to make it seem like Justin McCarthy is some sort of "denialist" or "liar" or "propagandist" when his work is so well supported. | ||
I also wanted to thank you for your initial edits at cleaning up that page, it was very honorable of you to help fight vandalism. Quite frankly, I'm not even sure why the heck "Armenia wikiproject" is involved in that article, but obviously not with good intentions. | |||
] (]) 04:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC) | ] (]) 04:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:54, 20 January 2008
StefenTower is a participant in WikiProject Louisville, an open collaborative effort to coordinate and develop appropriate, comprehensive and well-connected content covering metropolitan Louisville, Kentucky and related subjects in the Misplaced Pages. Join us! • Patrol changes • Cleanup issues (3,385 in 2,143 articles) • Project Talk WikiProject Louisville Alerts have been posted:
Articles for deletion
Articles to be split
|
- BY COMMENTING HERE, YOU SHOULD EXPECT THAT I WILL REPLY HERE
PLEASE NOTE: I tend to keep track of my new comments on other user talk pages, so please reply to those on your own talk page instead of here.
Archives |
---|
KFC/Kentucky Fried Chicken
Since you are in Louisville, could you please take the time to find any data regarding the naming change that KFC is currently embracing. Any hard data would be greatly appreciated.
Also, please do not get into and edit war over the KFM link on the KFC article. I have a feeling that Thumperward may seek an editing block if you do.
Jeremy Jerem43 23:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Right now, due to being too busy with other things, my Misplaced Pages work is severely constrained. I really have zero time for research right now. Sorry. Stevie is the man! 13:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't mean to come across as adversarial
In the case of this template, I'm a bit reflexive. My only goal is to make the tool as thoroughly useful and concise as possible, and Hal and I are both committed to keeping the standards high at this particular pass. Stewardship, not ownership. From looking at your user page statement, I suspect we're actually similar in many ways and practices, especially as it regards the overarching goal of transparency and the way fullness of knowledge this can improve all of us. I find myself disagreeing with other[REDACTED] users' actions all the time, but watching this self-corrective process occur (if rife with minor contextual conflict) has become one of my great joys. Arguing to higher truth demarks real friendship. Thanks! BusterD 14:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Beck's Mill
I think the Beck's Mill article deserves to be B-class, but I thought I should get your opinion on it.--Bedford 01:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Since I guess you're more acquainted with the subject, just use your best judgment. Stevie is the man! 01:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Strom Thurmond
I added an RfC at talk:Strom Thurmond regarding edits made by WatchingYouLikeAHawk (talk · contribs) (WYLAH), who has taken a point to Wikistalk my edits. The original additions were at Robert Byrd regarding the fact that Byrd recanted his views on racism (addition not by me), which were later removed by WYLAH and reinstated and cleaned up. WYLAH claims that the Slate is an op-ed piece.
I added the citations and some text regarding Thurmond's own admission that he never recounted racism fully to Strom Thurmond. I followed up with another citation: the interview that Thurmond gave in the Charlotte Observer, which is considered a reliable source.
WYLAH began corrupting the latter citation template by removing portions of the references and rendering the sources unreadable throughout the page. He later began to do this elsewhere in the page on my other addition, and rendered the references unreadable as well.
He removes the messages I leave him. He all but ignores the talk pages elsewhere, sans lying out vague threats to track my edits and report me for intimidation and etc., and ignores (like every admin so far) my case at WP:AIV. I opened up an RfC today, but this is pretty much the end of the road -- not much left go on here. A rewrite of the offending passages may be in the best interest, but I'm afraid that WYLAH would only revert it. Prior notices and warnings were left on his talk page regarding his conservative edits throughout, so I'm sure that he is coming from this on a biased viewpoint. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:36, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Fort Knox
Hey Stevie,
- I was wondering if you could help with the Fort Knox article. It has recieved some vandalism over the past month and unreferences material.
Jahnx 02:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Houston A. Baker, Jr.
I would like to remind you that you committed yourself to doing something about the Houston A. Baker, Jr. article. The article needs some positive and truthful content to balance out the negative content related to the Duke scandal. So far no one can really come up with something nice to say about HAB. We're all depending on you! --Anthon.Eff 01:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is a community project. Please feel free to work on the article. I am personally too busy to work in the Misplaced Pages that much at this time. Stevie is the man! 17:07, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Camp Joe Holt
Wanted to let you know I started this. If I can find a copy of Baird's book, I can easily get a DYK out of it.--Bedford 03:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent! thanks! Stevie is the man! 04:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of web applications
List of web applications, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of web applications satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of web applications and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of web applications during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spartaz 23:17, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of collaborative software
List of collaborative software, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of collaborative software satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and the Misplaced Pages deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of collaborative software and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of collaborative software during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spartaz 23:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Hey good sir ... been a while. Do you think "The Connection" in Louisville is notable enough to merit an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M-BMor (talk • contribs) 01:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it depends on what makes it notable... perhaps that it's the largest gay bar in Louisville, or that its theater is unique for the region? Not really sure, but if you want to go ahead, it might stick. Stevie is the man! 06:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Louisville Legion
I've started the Legion's article; thought you should know.--Bedford (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cool! Thank you for starting that. Stevie is the man! 05:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Revisions...
Why are you removing my inclusion about Ali/Clay collectibles? It is certainly as germaine as comic books and also quite often a connection that millions of Americans have to Ali. How can this not be relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.39.74 (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Disagreed. Stevie is the man! 20:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
You're kidding me, Stevie.
Stevie, please see the note I sent you directly. How you can suggest that the inclusion of VIDEO GAME and COMIC BOOK references is relevant but not much sought after trading card appearances or even more popular autographs is completely bizarre. They are the very definition of pop culture well beyond video game or comic book references. Moreover, your contributions not withstanding why do you get to make unilateral decisions as to the content of the page?
My authoritative submission as a certified expert in the field should be a welcome inclusion. It's hardly vandalism and adds to the page.
Worse yet, this willy-nilly editing style you've chosen to dispense is injurious to the future of Misplaced Pages and the attraction of professional writers or others in the know.
I take the time to write and submit something to the community and you without merit or reason get to simply kill it with a succinct and unexplained "disagreed."
Doesn't sound too 'wiki' to me and I'm not giving up.
Kindly let me know what doesn't fit WIKIPEDIA's rules, not Stevie, or stop vandalizing my contributions.
Be well,
Kurt —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.227.39.74 (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Cry, baby, cry. It's junk and it's not being accepted for obvious reasons. Stevie is the man! 06:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Caves or Caverns near Jeptha Knob?
Hey, just wondering if there were any natural caves or caverns in or under Jeptha Knob? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.69.245 (talk) 03:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
TableManners
There's an user named TableManners that is deleteing the Museums in Louisville category from any that are in Indiana. I am going to need assistance with this newbie that has already made self-righteous comments on my talk page about it.--Bedford (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Category_talk:Museums_in_Louisville
Could you take a look at the fifth solution Category_talk:Museums_in_Louisville? You previously supported the second solution, but you might like the fifth better. If you do not, could you comment on the fifth solution why? Thanks. TableManners 04:31, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Article move
Hello Stevietheman, I was just soliciting input for a request for an article move for Talk:The Brycc House. I found this article while making an assessment from a list of needing assessed and it needs a lot of work. This being one of the top priorities. Jahnx (talk) 07:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XXII (December 2007) | ||
|
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: | |
| ||
| ||
Tag & Assess 2007 is now officially over, with slightly under 68,000 articles processed. The top twenty scores are as follows:
Although the drive is officially closed, existing participants can continue tagging until January 31 if they wish, with the extra tags counting towards their tally for barnstar purposes. We'd like to see what lessons can be learned from this drive, so we've set up a feedback workshop. Comments and feedback from participants and non-particpants alike are very welcome and appreciated. | ||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Activity survey for members of WikiProject Companies
- placed on talk pages of all participants
I wanted to get a notion of the level of activity of people who are members of WikiProject Companies with respect to monitoring the WikiProject Talk page and participating in discussions of interest and/or responding to requests for input.
Could you please visit Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Companies/Member information#2008 Quarter 1 (Jan-Mar): Talk page monitoring survey and adding yourself to one or more of the several groupings listed?
Thanks for your assistance.
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
rollback
Hi, I think I have given you rollback privileges. when looking at diffs, or article histories or your watchlist, you should be able to rollback edits with just one click. This should just be used with simple vandalism or obvious mistake edits; anything else and you should do a manual revert so you can explain the reason. Let me know if it didn't work... the ability to give out rollback access to non-admins is still a new feature. --W.marsh 22:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, I think you read my mind. I was going to request using it. I definitely see it, and I will only use it according to the rules you state. Cheers! Stevie is the man! 22:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Your Dr. Justin McCarthy edit
I fixed up a couple things on Justin McCarthy, that seemed completely biased. It seems that the Armenian propagandists are trying their best to edit the Justin McCarthy article to make him look like some "nationalistic agenda follower", which is just not right. I thought Misplaced Pages had policies against portraying living person biographies in a negative way. Is anyone even allowed to add "Criticism of his work"? I mean because then you can add criticism of just about anybody. Anyway, I didn't remove anything cited or referenced properly. But be aware that people with Armenian nationalistic agendas are continuously vandalizing that page and semi-vandalizing it to make it seem like Justin McCarthy is some sort of "denialist" or "liar" or "propagandist" when his work is so well supported. I also wanted to thank you for your initial edits at cleaning up that page, it was very honorable of you to help fight vandalism. Quite frankly, I'm not even sure why the heck "Armenia wikiproject" is involved in that article, but obviously not with good intentions. Arsenic99 (talk) 04:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Category: