Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jmabel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:03, 3 December 2003 editLukobe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,288 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:57, 4 December 2003 edit undoJmabel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators90,309 edits removing a resolved issueNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi Jmabel. Regarding the Seattle article written by "Emmett Shear sarbandia@hotmail.com", he's provided me with a URL. Was it ever decided if for now the text should just be dumped into a History of Seattle article, or into a section of the Seattle article? Please reply on Hi Jmabel. Regarding the Seattle article written by "Emmett Shear sarbandia@hotmail.com", he's provided me with a URL. Was it ever decided if for now the text should just be dumped into a History of Seattle article, or into a section of the Seattle article? Please reply on
--] 22:01, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC) --] 22:01, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I notice that your robot change to ] broke the link to the Romanian-language article. Is this preparatory to a change on the Romanian-language site, or is this a screw-up? If the latter, I'm guessing the robot did the same to other pages, too. -- ] 20:42, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hello Jmabel.

The robot followed the old link <nowiki>]</nowiki> and noticed that the page on ro is a redirect to . So the robot changed the en: article so a user is not pointed to the redirect page but directly to the redirected page.
The actual link is <nowiki>]</nowiki> and output as <nowiki>http://ro.wikipedia.org/Bucure%C5%9Fti</nowiki> in html. This link should be correctly interpreted by your browser.

cheers,

Please answer on:

] 21:14, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:57, 4 December 2003

Hi Jmabel. Regarding the Seattle article written by "Emmett Shear sarbandia@hotmail.com", he's provided me with a URL. Was it ever decided if for now the text should just be dumped into a History of Seattle article, or into a section of the Seattle article? Please reply on my talk page --Lukobe 22:01, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)