Misplaced Pages

User talk:Snowolf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:27, 25 January 2008 edit172.207.227.119 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 22:27, 25 January 2008 edit undoStuartStewart (talk | contribs)135 edits Respectful correction: new sectionNext edit →
Line 119: Line 119:


I beleive this validates much un heard information. Is this not a info sharing site. I would be intersted in the amount of people who support this comment. I beleive this validates much un heard information. Is this not a info sharing site. I would be intersted in the amount of people who support this comment.

== Respectful correction ==

Dear Snowolf,

thank you for your friendly guidance; in order to reciprocate, I feel I owe you an explanation:
My recent alteration was in no way an attempt at vandalism or misguided sandplay, as it were; I felt that given the limited size of the "Ferrer (surname)" entry, it wold actually be more beneficial to users if it were reinstated to its original position, i.e. s.v. "Ferrer", whence it was transformed into a separate subpage in December, 2007.
I still believe reinserting the information under "Ferrer" would be beneficial; naturally, however, I bow to your experience,if you continue to maintain that its present position is preferable.

Kind regards,

StuartStewart

Revision as of 22:27, 25 January 2008

Snowolf's talk page
Snowolf (talk botwiki u:space admin scout npw vp)

Important! – please read the following before reporting a mistake of mine:

  1. I do make mistakes while reverting vandalism. The following talk page will be probably full of correct complains, but please take into account the high number of reverts I make every day. It's still only a small percentage of my antivandalism work.
  2. Don't be angry. If I reverted an edit from you which I shouldn't have, I'm really sorry. If you (as I kindly ask you to) warn me of my mistake here, I'll remove my warning from your talk page and I'll be happy to present you my apologies.
  3. Please create a new section for every report (to do so, click here). It helps keep everything in order.
  4. Remember to sign your comment by adding ~~~~ (four tildes) at its end. It helps identifying who made the report.
  5. State clearly which article is the one you're talking about, if you can, a diff (link to the difference between my edit and yours) would be very helpful.
  6. I'll always reply on your talk page. That's because this page is archived every day (which means that section where the last comments is older than one day get removed). If you're an IP and you wish me to answer here, state this in your message, but remember to check the archives if you can't find my message.
  7. I'm not a bot, nor using any fully-automated tools to revert vandalism. I do assure you so.

I do read messages on this talk page as soon as they're posted, if I'm around, but I'll probably answer them later.

Your friend User:Snowolf Note to fellow vandalfighters: please do not revert vandalism left here, as long as it doesn't remove others' comments or break something. Thanks.

Jordan Hasay

What? I'm Jordan Hasay's #1 fan man, I know what I'm talking about :D! —Preceding unsigned comment added by B0bby flay (talkcontribs) 01:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Italian admins

Sai che pare che tu non sia l'unico admin italiano di en.wp? C'è anche User:Mushroom, admin da fine 2005. Non mi stupirei se ce ne fossero anche altri comunque.. --Jaqen (talk) 02:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

hi

I wanted to know that should not there be a mention of the 1992 attack by muslim terorists on Karnak temple complex ? I guesss you have worked on this page. Jon Ascton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 40

Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 40 has been released!

.mp3 and .ogg versions can be found at http://wikipediaweekly.org/2008/01/24/episode-40-wikipedias-genetic-makeup/, and, as always, you can download past episodes and leave comments at http://wikipediaweekly.com/.

For Misplaced Pages Weekly — WODUP 05:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you are listed on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery.
If you do not wish to receive such notifications, please remove yourself from the list.

30K...

This is yet another complaint about your edit count: two more weeks at the same rate and you break into the top 100 contributors... You'll make a mockery of everyone if you do. :P · AndonicO 14:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

You know...

The text in the page isn't appearing. In the sandbox I copied it, deleted the text, and pasted ot again. The text worked. I was simply going to do this for the whole page, but I guess I'm not welcome.LordJesseD (talk) 14:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


Mistaken revert

Please take a look at your recent revert revert you made to Federal Employees Health Benefit Plan. The article was created using the wrong name for the federal program involved. I've created a new article under the correct name Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and copied _all_ of the text from the original article to the new one. The last step was to redirect the original, incorrectly titled article to the new one. That's what I tried to explain in shorthand form in my edit summary ("Redirect to article under the program's correct official name") That's also the step you just reverted. Please take a look. If you see anything inappropriate about this move, let's talk - but I think you'll agree that it was the correct move. If you have any question about the correct title, look at the website for the program (). Thanks, EastTN (talk) 15:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

URL has been vandalized. Dalhousie Peer NOT www.saveport.ca

My apologies. Here is the URL for which I am reporting vandalism.

Misplaced Pages site: http://en.wikipedia.org/Port_Dalhousie

Our Dalhousie Peer Magazine URL has been changed to www.saveport.ca

www.saveport.ca is a site in direct conflict with our mandate. THAT change is the vandalism. The original Dalhousie Peer Magazine URL was set up with: www.peer2000.com

It is Dalhousie Peer Magazine's URL that has been vandalized!

I respectfully request you search for whoever made that original Change and how they were able to do it without being charged with vandalism.

Please respond immediately. Wainmanl (talk) 15:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

wainmanl@sympatico.ca —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainmanl (talkcontribs) 15:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandal?

I think my page has been vandalized. Could you keep an eye on my talk page and make sure that this doesn't happen again? If you know who's doing it, please block the user. Thanks!Dark Executioner (talk) 15:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)Dark Executioner

AAA Life Insurance Company should NOT redirect to AAA Automotive Company

AAA Life Insurance Company should NOT redirect to AAA Automotive Company. Please remove the redirect. AAA Life Insurance Company and AAA are SEPARATE companies. I was not vandalizing the page but rather correcting it. Please remove the redirect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mktgupdate (talkcontribs) 21:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Simon Willard

Hi, Snowolf. I have been the same user Andres Arce, previously. I am trying to fix the disaster which have happened with my old article. I didn't want to vandalize the wikipedia. Glad to message you... 2008ana (talk) 21:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana p.d.: is it possible that i might continue with my clean up? if not it will be fine, don't worry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2008ana (talkcontribs) 21:09, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

ok, Snowolf, i will do that from now on. tx for replying so fast. glad to message you.2008ana (talk) 21:19, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana

by the way, keep up fighting vandalism ! 2008ana (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana

the funny part was that i tried to follow the complicated instructions, to revert the first reversion of my edition but i got lost... glad to message you.2008ana (talk) 21:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)2008ana

Get a Life

And stay out of mine. Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... Maybe I was wrong. Sorry and all that, I completely overreacted. Iloveamerica2much (talk) 21:24, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Condom

Excuse me but your comment on my input onto the condom section was extremely offensive. I put a alot of effort into making a useful contribution adding real world angles to the information page. How valid is this internet site if people simply choose the information put forward, i realise it must be moderated but who has the right to decide what is acceptable. My information is just as valid as the next.

Thank you for your time and i leave deeply offended and in dispair of the state of this once great site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.227.119 (talkcontribs) 22:24, 25 Jan 2008

Excuse me but your comment on my input onto the condom section was extremely offensive. I put a alot of effort into making a useful contribution adding real world angles to the information page. How valid is this internet site if people simply choose the information put forward, i realise it must be moderated but who has the right to decide what is acceptable. My information is just as valid as the next.

Thank you for your time and i leave deeply offended and in dispair of the state of this once great site.

Also the rubber johny is used in many schools across the world as a balloon. One blows up the johny with the mouth like a balloon, or you can put it over your head and blow through your nose. This is often done to the obese person in the class as they look much like a pig when blowing through their nose.If a rubber john is used (blown up many times) it gets full of saliva, this looks much like gook (A.K.A Semen, cum, white magic, jizz, the fuzz, bernard o'donahan, john of arc, bum fun, sea-monkeys, spearinajar, etc) which can often be an unwanted sight when the john has been discarded as it looks as if sexual humpy dump has occured and the gook (A.K.A Hilary Clinton, white gold, wet dream, spokey dokies, spunk and all of the mentioned above) Many beleive the Johnny defines the man, the phrase manners maketh the man possibly originated from the idea of a Johnny being an important peice of human society.Some also beleive the phrase rubber johhny came from the Swedish architect (Yohof Lehnsjohn) who made his name selling fingers from a 'marigold' glove and in some cases elastic bands, as a condom when little were available. The buyers of the condom would simply call it a john or rubber johny after Yohof's second name. Although many disputes rage over the origin of the condom as examples of primitive contraception have been found as early as Egyptian periods.(HF)

I beleive this validates much un heard information. Is this not a info sharing site. I would be intersted in the amount of people who support this comment.

Respectful correction

Dear Snowolf,

thank you for your friendly guidance; in order to reciprocate, I feel I owe you an explanation: My recent alteration was in no way an attempt at vandalism or misguided sandplay, as it were; I felt that given the limited size of the "Ferrer (surname)" entry, it wold actually be more beneficial to users if it were reinstated to its original position, i.e. s.v. "Ferrer", whence it was transformed into a separate subpage in December, 2007. I still believe reinserting the information under "Ferrer" would be beneficial; naturally, however, I bow to your experience,if you continue to maintain that its present position is preferable.

Kind regards,

StuartStewart