| Revision as of 14:09, 26 January 2008 editW guice (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers28,232 editsm →Boys with xray eyes: d← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:56, 29 January 2008 edit undoEliasAlucard (talk | contribs)13,227 edits →Boys with xray eyes: delNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :] says that the band should be the subject of ''multiple'' non-trivial published works. In any case, a search of the fails to find anything relating to this band. Ditto for the . —]] 20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | :] says that the band should be the subject of ''multiple'' non-trivial published works. In any case, a search of the fails to find anything relating to this band. Ditto for the . —]] 20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. Non-notable group per ] as yet. Maybe after their tours they will be in with more of a chance. ''']''' 14:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Non-notable group per ] as yet. Maybe after their tours they will be in with more of a chance. ''']''' 14:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' — Shitty article and probably self-promotion to an unknown band. — <small><small>] (] '''·''' ]) 02:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)</small></small> | |||
Revision as of 02:56, 29 January 2008
Boys with xray eyes
- Boys with xray eyes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Author removed PROD without explanation, so here we are: Article is about a band that fails WP:MUSIC notability guidelines. —Travis 22:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Inadequate evidence of notability. —SlamDiego←T 11:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - based on the list of upcoming dates, this looks rather like advertising. Aside from spam, they faile WP:MUSIC. According to the article, they've only done local gigs, and are unsigned. There is no coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - I've heard of them and I neither come from that area nor listen to that type of music. I know it was them because I remember thinking the name was the same as the debut album by Babylon Zoo. Assuming the claims are true then they are notable from the Kerrang bit alone. I suggest keeping it but putting a request for references to be sited. Skip1337 (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- WP:MUSIC says that the band should be the subject of multiple non-trivial published works. In any case, a search of the Kerrang! website fails to find anything relating to this band. Ditto for the Metal Hammer website. —Travis 20:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable group per WP:BAND as yet. Maybe after their tours they will be in with more of a chance. tomasz. 14:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Delete — Shitty article and probably self-promotion to an unknown band. — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 02:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)