Revision as of 17:12, 16 July 2005 edit82.123.175.128 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:25, 17 July 2005 edit undoMathbot (talk | contribs)Bots472,776 edits Robot-assisted spelling. See User:Mathbot/Logged misspellings for changes.Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In 2002, a pair of brothers (]), managed to get several papers published to physics journals which were wrongfully considered by a |
In 2002, a pair of brothers (]), managed to get several papers published to physics journals which were wrongfully considered by a French physicist, Max Niedermaier, as a hoax similar (to ]) ] under a layer of dense technical ]. Max Niedermaier retracted publicly and the brothers have since defended their theories (which claim to deal with the area of ]), and the veracity of their work seems to have recently gained new supporters among certain researchers in theoretical physics : http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/06/bogdanoff-papers.html. | ||
==External links == | ==External links == |
Revision as of 02:25, 17 July 2005
In 2002, a pair of brothers (Igor and Grichka Bogdanov), managed to get several papers published to physics journals which were wrongfully considered by a French physicist, Max Niedermaier, as a hoax similar (to Sokal) pseudoscience under a layer of dense technical jargon. Max Niedermaier retracted publicly and the brothers have since defended their theories (which claim to deal with the area of topological field theory), and the veracity of their work seems to have recently gained new supporters among certain researchers in theoretical physics : http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/06/bogdanoff-papers.html.
External links
- A discussion of the controversy.
- Additional discussion with various people related to the brothers academically.
This science article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |