Misplaced Pages

Main			Talk			Awards			Archives

User:Jccmcapital

OK, I’ve done my best. But to no avail. This person is a control freak! Check out the discussion on http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Tintle How can we make this work? Thanks: Jcmcapital (talk) 01:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

OK thanks, but the person that has eliminated many of my additions, and has been admonished for doing such by others has not been available on her talk page, and unresponsive to me. What to do? Jcmcapital (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean when you say "Talk on the article's talk pahge" Thanks:Jcmcapital (talk) 00:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks: I'll try that again!! (for the fourth time)Jcmcapital (talk) 02:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

 Done 14:32, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Block

I thought your block of Eastmids2007 was rather harsh considering he had not received a final notice and the article he was editing has been deleted today. I would have thought that was enough response for the time being unless he returns and reposts the same article and/or starts spamming again. Just my 2c worth, but I am watching him! Cheers - I reply where I post. ww2censor (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

He was recreating the same page - or at least a page on a certain company - over and over, and inserting links to that page in other articles. While the block may have erred towards 'strict', I still think I was within the boundaries for blocking spammers :P Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:46, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Tramadol semiprotect

 Done
Thanks, it's much needed. I hope it's renewed, since there seems to be a long-term push from online peddlars of the drug to add their external links. Tony (talk) 14:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

It might be worth making a spam report, or getting norad or nomad.ru, or whatever the website is, completely blacklisted. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 14:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Query on block

Hello. Just curious as to why you blocked 198.7.241.81 (talk · contribs) . I was going to "decline block for inactive IP" as the address in question has not edited since January 19th. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I see it as the 20th? "04:01, 20 January 2008 (hist) (diff) North Andover, Massachusetts‎ (→History)"Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:02, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, adjusting for time zone differences, the report to WP:AIV was made over 36 hours after the IP's last edit. I take it you have a more flexible view of criteria #2? Perhaps I should be that way, as I have always viewed super late AIV reports like this a waste of our (admin) time. Just curious as to your view ... --Kralizec! (talk) 17:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

More like 12 hours, I think - but I see your point. I think with an IP that constantly skirts the final warnings, like this one, having a short block makes them less likely to do it in future, as well as making future admins more likely to block at the first sign of trouble. With scripts, it takes as long to block an IP as it does to remove a report and explain to the user who made the report why it wasn't accepted! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

From my EST perspective, the last edit by the IP was 23:01, 19 January 2008, and the AIV report was made at 11:44, 21 January 2008. Unless my math is off, that is 36 hours, 43 minutes between the two. --Kralizec! (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

e-mail

Can I ask a stupid question regarding this situation? How does one check the e-mail as noted in the complaint?

Thanks. - Revolving Bugbear 17:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I expect one would have to contact the editor in question. Certainly I don't have the power to view it! I blocked as a sockpuppet, not for threats, you see, so I don't have to see the email, but the user still gets blocked. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Ah, understood. From the way it was phrased, it sounded as if there were a way for admins to view e-mails, which I was skeptical of. Now I know why. Thanks. - Revolving Bugbear 18:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Scotstown Primary School

Hi, just to check that you are cool with me making a new redirect to Bridge of Don where I intend to add some content? TerriersFan (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Following recreation of the page I have now created a protected redirect. TerriersFan (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

IPs 156.34x

Hello, remember all those band articles you've restored after the User: 156.34.221.194 had his fun with them? Well, he's doing it again, this time as User: 156.34.142.110. Please, PLEASE, do something about it... Óðinn (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, please note another case of incivility by him here. Óðinn (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

You forgot to add how I basically made the same joking comment on my friend Admin Wiki alf's talk page. I lost my AGF 30000 edits ago so bear with me when frustration levels over potential sockpuppets raises my ire. BTW, thanks for linking my IP user page here... it's the one with all the Barnstars. Chase me Ladies I invite you to join in the pertinent discussion on Admin Wiki alf's talk page here. Some of your earlier edits were troubling and I discussed them... among other things with Sir Alf. Feel free to comment/converse with us there. Have a nice day! 156.34.142.110 (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Issue with Skin/S.K.I.N. titling

Hello! I noticed you had some involvement with the previous dispute in the Skin (Japanese band) article some months ago. I wish I'd been there at the time because I've got some pretty undeniable proof of the band name that was such a big deal. JRock Revolution is the official site for the JRock Revolution festival and is at the moment the official site for the band. In their FAQ, it says:

"Q: Which is correct, SKIN or S.K.I.N.?

A: S.K.I.N."

and also on what it abbreviates:

"Q: What does S.K.I.N. stand for?

A: That information is not available. It has not even been confirmed that S.K.I.N. even stands for anything."

The link to this official FAQ is here: http://jrockrevolution.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=71&Itemid=25

I've also posted these things in the discussion section of the article, but don't expect it to get any attention since things have become dead quiet since its lock a few months ago. So, seeing that you had been involved, I hoped to get some closure on the issue, and also give some other bands or artists their name back. XD Thanks a lot for the help now and in the past, and I look forward to knowing the outcome of this. :) (Tsukiakari (talk) 02:38, 23 January 2008 (UTC))

Reverts

I'm not sure that this was correct. The logo seems like an abuse of a nonfree image, and to add nothing; and, per WP:FLAG, such use of flags in an infobox is generally deprecated. Why not join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox Musical artist instead, and save the reverts for unambiguous vandalism, which I do not think this was? Best wishes, --John (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

The editor seemed to be making edits without the discussion having reached a conclusion - edits like that are counter-productive. He'd be better joining the debate too, I think! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

lolcat bible

Cheers for your message on my talk page about the lolcatbible AfD result. I'm still considering my plan for merging it into the lolcat article, I have found a few more sources, but I'm thinking adding that new section to the main article, and beefing that up, then maybe splitting it off again if/when loads more sources come in, might be the best idea. The lolcat article doesn't seem too far off GA-level, so there may be something in there. But yes, either way I'm up for taking it on, once I've finished this awfully torturous essay on DAT machines for the end of this semester, I'll get down to work on it! Cheers, - Zeibura 12:18, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Semi-Protection of No

Your indefinite semi-protection of this page is against our protection policy. Pages should only be permanently (semi-)protected if there is long term abuse and I don't see this from the page history. Indeed the vandalism appears to have been one instance so protection would almost certainly be refused at RFPP. Please can you reconsider this. Spartaz 22:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think it's a page that is frequently watchlisted - What can be said about the word has generally been said in the article. Feel free to unprotect, but I see very few legitimate additions coming out of doing so! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Protection of WW2OL

I've unprotected the page - the protection has been in force two months, the dispute is stale and the MedCabal case is essentially inactive. We should keep protection to the minimum needed. FCYTravis (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Vadama

Sir, may I remind you of an instance, on the 17th of January, when you had blocked the I.P. address 203.101.110.2 for repeated vandalism of the article on Iyers? The user in question was also given to vandalising the page on Vadama, a sub-category of the Iyers, and after the lapse of your ban, has taken to defacing this latter page with redoubled enthusiasm. I have on numerous occasions reverted his edits, but seem to have failed in checking him. May I request you to consider further punitive measures against this known depredator? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.226.42.84 (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

8th London WIkipedia Meetup: POSTPONED!

Hi! I've decided to postpone the meetup pending a new date, as too many regulars / people who signed up have said that they will not likely make it. Please go over to the talk page and let's discuss a new date! Poeloq (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Regine Velasquez

Howdy! Thank you sir, for placing the Regine Velasquez article on semi-protect. Maoster (talk) 18:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Important information

Bob doesn't like you.