| Revision as of 17:06, 9 February 2008 editCapitana (talk | contribs)280 edits →Collapse of the World Trade Center← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:29, 10 February 2008 edit undoBless sins (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers16,862 edits →WP:STALK: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| I stand corrected on the reference. However I will certainly search it out and see if I can indeed find a verifiable source for what the user was trying to say - I'm assuming good faith that he or she simply forgot the url of the website they were referencing. --] (]) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | I stand corrected on the reference. However I will certainly search it out and see if I can indeed find a verifiable source for what the user was trying to say - I'm assuming good faith that he or she simply forgot the url of the website they were referencing. --] (]) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I took the liberty of reading through your contribs after I resolved the dispute on Collapse of the World Trade Center. I didn't at all like what I saw. I would request that you don't use ] as a tool to be unpleasant towards other editors. If something is a violation of policy a neutral editor will normally remove it. You on the other hand have an agenda and 99.9% of your edits have been to articles about Muslims or Islam. Do you have a reason to dislike Muslims at all sir? --] (]) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | :I took the liberty of reading through your contribs after I resolved the dispute on Collapse of the World Trade Center. I didn't at all like what I saw. I would request that you don't use ] as a tool to be unpleasant towards other editors. If something is a violation of policy a neutral editor will normally remove it. You on the other hand have an agenda and 99.9% of your edits have been to articles about Muslims or Islam. Do you have a reason to dislike Muslims at all sir? --] (]) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == WP:STALK == | |||
| Please mind WP:STALK. Here on the article "]" was a revert of . (Needless to say your edit was promptly reverted by a third party) Such behavior violates WP:STALK. If you continue this, I'll have no choice but to report you. Have a good day.] (]) 07:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:29, 10 February 2008
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Prester_John. |
| File:Usa.gif | Welcome to "Talk to the Hand". |
⇒ Start a new Talk topic. |
Collapse of the World Trade Center
I stand corrected on the reference. However I will certainly search it out and see if I can indeed find a verifiable source for what the user was trying to say - I'm assuming good faith that he or she simply forgot the url of the website they were referencing. --Capitana (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of reading through your contribs after I resolved the dispute on Collapse of the World Trade Center. I didn't at all like what I saw. I would request that you don't use WP:MOSISLAM as a tool to be unpleasant towards other editors. If something is a violation of policy a neutral editor will normally remove it. You on the other hand have an agenda and 99.9% of your edits have been to articles about Muslims or Islam. Do you have a reason to dislike Muslims at all sir? --Capitana (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
WP:STALK
Please mind WP:STALK. Here your first edit on the article "Secular state" was a revert of my edit. (Needless to say your edit was promptly reverted by a third party) Such behavior violates WP:STALK. If you continue this, I'll have no choice but to report you. Have a good day.Bless sins (talk) 07:29, 10 February 2008 (UTC)