| Revision as of 18:44, 15 February 2008 editSeminarist (talk | contribs)347 edits Comments← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:11, 15 February 2008 edit undoCebactokpatop (talk | contribs)252 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| I have not vandalised the ] page. You appear to be retaliating to my removal of vandalism which you placed on the ] page by adding a vandalism tag to my talk page. The reason I added a vandalism tag was your picture of Zizioulas sitting beside the Pope which had been labelled 'Picture of the John Zizioulas (black robe) revealing his true face and position.' Please see Misplaced Pages ]. | I have not vandalised the ] page. You appear to be retaliating to my removal of vandalism which you placed on the ] page by adding a vandalism tag to my talk page. The reason I added a vandalism tag was your picture of Zizioulas sitting beside the Pope which had been labelled 'Picture of the John Zizioulas (black robe) revealing his true face and position.' Please see Misplaced Pages ]. | ||
| ---- | |||
| Yes you have. You are promoting "pro" Zizioulas view by calling all those who disagree with you "vandals". Your attempt to hide the fact that many people disagree with his work is obvious. What is very low is the way you are tying to do it. | |||
| ] (]) 20:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:11, 15 February 2008
NPOV on John Zizioulas page
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to John Zizioulas. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Cebactokpatop (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I have not vandalised the John Zizioulas page. You appear to be retaliating to my removal of vandalism which you placed on the John Zizioulas page by adding a vandalism tag to my talk page. The reason I added a vandalism tag was your picture of Zizioulas sitting beside the Pope which had been labelled 'Picture of the John Zizioulas (black robe) revealing his true face and position.' Please see Misplaced Pages BLP.
Yes you have. You are promoting "pro" Zizioulas view by calling all those who disagree with you "vandals". Your attempt to hide the fact that many people disagree with his work is obvious. What is very low is the way you are tying to do it.