Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Japanese weaver: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:49, 19 February 2008 editJonny-mt (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users9,646 editsm Reverted 1 edit by CarolSpears; Rv addition of {{citation needed}} to opinion. using TW ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:56, 19 February 2008 edit undoCarolSpears (talk \| contribs)4,221 edits →Japanese weaver Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Support''' looks good. -- ] (]) 21:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)		*'''Support''' looks good. -- ] (]) 21:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
	*'''Support''' looks good as far as I can tell. ] (]) 22:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)		*'''Support''' looks good as far as I can tell. ] (]) 22:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
	*'''Support''' - A good quality, encyclopedic image. --]-]] 01:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)		*'''Support''' - A good quality, encyclopedic{{citation needed}} image. --]-]] 01:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

	<!-- additional votes go above this line -->		<!-- additional votes go above this line -->

Revision as of 03:56, 19 February 2008

Reason: A clear illustration of an early nineteenth century Japanese loom and component parts: several heddles with their mounting and attachments, which the weaver controls with her foot, and a beater in her hand. Restored version of Image:Japaneseweavera.jpg.
Articles this image appears in: Heddle, Beater (weaving)
Creator: Yanagawa Shigenobu

Support as nominator Durova 19:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Support looks good. -- Grandpafootsoldier (talk) 21:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Support looks good as far as I can tell. Juliancolton (Talk) 22:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Support - A good quality, encyclopedic image. --jonny-m t 01:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)