Misplaced Pages

Bogdanov affair: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:25, 17 July 2005 editMathbot (talk | contribs)Bots472,776 edits Robot-assisted spelling. See User:Mathbot/Logged misspellings for changes.← Previous edit Revision as of 22:13, 20 July 2005 edit undoAnville (talk | contribs)6,887 edits reversion and POV-ectomyNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
In 2002, a pair of brothers (]), managed to get several papers published to physics journals which were wrongfully considered by a French physicist, Max Niedermaier, as a hoax similar (to ]) ] under a layer of dense technical ]. Max Niedermaier retracted publicly and the brothers have since defended their theories (which claim to deal with the area of ]), and the veracity of their work seems to have recently gained new supporters among certain researchers in theoretical physics : http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/06/bogdanoff-papers.html. In ], a pair of brothers (]), managed to get several papers published in physics journals which, upon closer inspection, seemed to be full of ] under a layer of dense technical ]. The brothers have since defended their theories (which claim to deal with the area of ]), but the veracity of their work remains in extreme doubt.

The incident has been termed a "reverse ]", though the parallel between the two cases is far from exact.


==External links == ==External links ==

Revision as of 22:13, 20 July 2005

In 2002, a pair of brothers (Igor and Grichka Bogdanov), managed to get several papers published in physics journals which, upon closer inspection, seemed to be full of pseudoscience under a layer of dense technical jargon. The brothers have since defended their theories (which claim to deal with the area of topological field theory), but the veracity of their work remains in extreme doubt.

The incident has been termed a "reverse Sokal Affair", though the parallel between the two cases is far from exact.

External links

Stub icon

This science article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: