| Revision as of 00:23, 12 February 2008 view sourceCvyvvZkmSUDowVf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,542 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:59, 19 February 2008 view source Instinct (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,851 edits →Rickey Henderson: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| : I updated ] to use the "archive banner" template again. I think you'll like the improvements I made. Thanks for your suggestion. ] (]) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | : I updated ] to use the "archive banner" template again. I think you'll like the improvements I made. Thanks for your suggestion. ] (]) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks! ] (]) 14:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | ::Thanks! ] (]) 14:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| I completely agree with your comment to ]. Please see my comment, and then based off of that - shall we ask for a reassessment? - ] ] ] 18:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:59, 19 February 2008
You have new messages (last change).
 Archives | |
|
|
Archive box
Please note that some articles have additional information in their "manual" archive boxes, such as date ranges, issues addressed within the archive and so on. I have reverted your change in the archive style at Talk:Albert Einstein (I hope you don't mind). Anyway, I trust you will use sound judgement on whether an automatic archive box works for a particular talk page or not. Cheers, Silly rabbit (talk) 04:28, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I updated Talk:Albert Einstein to use the "archive banner" template again. I think you'll like the improvements I made. Thanks for your suggestion. Timneu22 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! Silly rabbit (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Rickey Henderson
I completely agree with your comment to this. Please see my comment, and then based off of that - shall we ask for a reassessment? - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)