| Revision as of 02:16, 24 February 2008 editDengero (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,637 edits defence← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:33, 26 February 2008 edit undoBusta777 (talk | contribs)34 edits →Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpgNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| All of these photos of ] have a statement from the photographer releasing the photo into the public domain. Its pretty clear that these are false. Three ]'s uploaded photos claiming to be Laura Grier: {{User|Bobbo1}} uploaded ], {{User|Newmunch}} uploaded ], and {{User|Newzie}} uploaded ]. Bobbo1 is probably a sockpuppet of {{User|Rock100}}. According to Rock100's they uploaded a photo of Nicole Lapin claiming to be Laura Grier several days before Bobbo1 and several of the other photos Bobbo1 uploaded had been previously uploaded by Rock100. A few hours after Bobbo1 uploaded ], a SPA {{User|Exposay1}} uploaded ] claiming to be David Gabber. ] (]) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — ] (]) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC). | No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — ] (]) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC). | ||
Revision as of 03:33, 26 February 2008
| < February 22 | February 24 > |
|---|
February 23
Image:Anthony-epps-25.jpg
Appears to be an WP:SPA using {{PD-self}} illigetimately to curcumvent the WP:NFCC. — pd_THOR | 07:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Dr Cook BB Western.JPG
The image is tagged public domain but has a comment that the copyright holder gave the uploader permission to post the image on Misplaced Pages. Has the copyright holder in fact released the photo into the public domain? --Una Smith (talk) 07:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Robertas_Javtokas.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:18, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Andrey_Vorontsevich.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Alexey_Shved.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:19, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Thomas_Van_Den_Spiegel.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Anatoly_Kashirov.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Mindaugas_Lukauskis.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Kenan_Bajramović.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Chuck_Eidson.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Marcus_Goree.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:FinalFour_2008.jpg
no evidence of GFDL Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Rodina_Stadium.jpg
no evidence of GFDL in the source Rettetast (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Ishida_with_seeleschneider.png
no evidence of GFDL. Image found on google Rettetast (talk) 12:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:06MGR 45 chantier vn 19 d'ensemble 2A.jpg
I could not find any evidence of the GFDL on the site the description page says the image came from - therefore I assume it is copyrighted and therefore non-free. Andreworkney (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI.jpg
See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Nicole Lapin WIKI 1.jpg
See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Nicole Lapin exposay.jpg
See Misplaced Pages:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_February_23#Image:Nicole_Lapin_pic.jpg BlueAzure (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Nicole Lapin pic.jpg
Image:Anthonygreen.jpg
No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
Image:WIKIHEADSHOT.jpg
No evidence that the uploader is the subject of the image (unlikely), or that the subject has given permission for this image to be used — PC78 (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
Image:DCDouglas.jpg
No evidence that the uploader has created this image or holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
Image:Lee_Tergesen_in_2005.jpg
Only remaining image by uploader unproven to be a copyright violation. Appears to be another upload using an illigetimate license to circumvent WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | 20:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:BerniceLiuRedPacket.jpg
No evidence that the uploader holds copyright — PC78 (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC).
- What kind of evidence do you want? want me to take a picture of the full thing instead of just cutting the top? Dengero (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- With respect, it looks like this is an image taken from a website or scanned from a magazine or somewhere. If that is the case, then you are not the copyright holder. If you are the original photographer (which I doubt), or have been granted permission to use this image on Misplaced Pages, then please provide some evidence that this is the case. PC78 (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not too familiar with the copyright policies but does this count? Dengero (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- With respect, it looks like this is an image taken from a website or scanned from a magazine or somewhere. If that is the case, then you are not the copyright holder. If you are the original photographer (which I doubt), or have been granted permission to use this image on Misplaced Pages, then please provide some evidence that this is the case. PC78 (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
