| Revision as of 03:38, 22 February 2008 editAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,258 edits →Abortion and Mental Health: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:30, 26 February 2008 edit undoNCdave (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,315 edits →WP:AENext edit → | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| Based on your behavior at ], which I believe was disruptive, I have filed a report at ] asking that you be banned from ] and its talk page under the terms of the ArbCom sanctions against you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | Based on your behavior at ], which I believe was disruptive, I have filed a report at ] asking that you be banned from ] and its talk page under the terms of the ArbCom sanctions against you. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I've filed a request at ] for the expansion of remedies from ]. Briefly, I'm asking that the sanctions allowing you to be banned from specific articles for disruptive behavior be extended to apply to all pages (talkspace, projectspace, etc) where your conduct is disruptive, rather than applying solely to articlespace. I'm notifying you as an involved party in the original ArbCom case. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | :I've filed a request at ] for the expansion of remedies from ]. Briefly, I'm asking that the sanctions allowing you to be banned from specific articles for disruptive behavior be extended to apply to all pages (talkspace, projectspace, etc) where your conduct is disruptive, rather than applying solely to articlespace. I'm notifying you as an involved party in the original ArbCom case. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::After looking at some of your contributions, Ferrylodge, it appears to me MastCell is out to ban you, not for disruptiveness, but because you do not share his POV. Your edits are consistently well-sourced, constructive, and encyclopedic; your demeanor consistently excellent; your points consistently cogent. Please do not be discouraged. ] (]) 11:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Abortion and Mental Health == | == Abortion and Mental Health == | ||
Revision as of 11:30, 26 February 2008
Archives
Archive 1: Beginning of Time to 14 March 2007 (plus one comment by Ferrylodge on 27 September 2007).
Archive 2: 14 March 2007 to 14 May 2007.
Archive 3: 14 May 2007 to 15 June 2007.
Archive 4: 15 June 2007 to 11 September 2007.
Archive 5: 11 September 2007 to 13 November 2007.
Archive 6: 13 November 2007 to 30 November 2007.
Archive 7: 30 November 2007 to 31 December 2007.
Archive 8: 31 December 2007 to 19 February 2008.
WP:AE
Based on your behavior at Talk:Abortion, which I believe was disruptive, I have filed a report at WP:AE asking that you be banned from abortion and its talk page under the terms of the ArbCom sanctions against you. MastCell 19:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've filed a request at WP:RfArb for the expansion of remedies from Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Ferrylodge. Briefly, I'm asking that the sanctions allowing you to be banned from specific articles for disruptive behavior be extended to apply to all pages (talkspace, projectspace, etc) where your conduct is disruptive, rather than applying solely to articlespace. I'm notifying you as an involved party in the original ArbCom case. MastCell 21:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- After looking at some of your contributions, Ferrylodge, it appears to me MastCell is out to ban you, not for disruptiveness, but because you do not share his POV. Your edits are consistently well-sourced, constructive, and encyclopedic; your demeanor consistently excellent; your points consistently cogent. Please do not be discouraged. NCdave (talk) 11:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Abortion and Mental Health
I see MastCell is out to silence you too. For my part, thanks for participating in the discussion regarding Koop at abortion. It was very helpful information. That and other reliable information that continues to get purged at abortion and mental health truly distort these articles. In the latter article, editors have openly purged over 22 peer reviewed references to push their POV. I have added additional notes on the discussion page regarding materials that have consistently been purged from abortion and mental health. Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated.--Strider12 (talk) 03:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the message. I'll try to get back to you soon, but have much other stuff to do right at the moment. I haven't reviewed your edits, so I can't say yet who appears to be right or wrong, and I also have never edited at abortion and mental health. However, I hope to have enough free time soon to give you a more helpful response than this one.Ferrylodge (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)