Misplaced Pages

Directory:
Archives
March 2006 – July 2006 August 2006 – October 2006 November 2006 – April 2007 May 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – May 2008 May 2008 – July 2009 August 2009 –

Request

May I once again request you to split this page from this article. You must have noticed that I am seriousely working in compliance with the guidelines of wikipedia, I assure you that I will try my level best to make it an appropriate article.

--Asikhi (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Not convinced

1. More than 13 reliable sources have been used to cite references
2. According to my understanding I have just mentioned the websites of ASI & MFI, that doesn’t meant to promote their website but to inform reader that, which website belongs to whom.
3. Therefore, I once again request you to kindly split the page.

All details of ASI has been copied to User:iamsaa's page, from now onwards, he will take care of ASI. Thanks--Asikhi (talk) 09:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

You really missed the point of my message. Why should they be split? I see no compelling reason. — Scientizzle 16:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Because in my view both are different things,One is about a personality and other is about an Organization, they both should be seperate. Allow me to say thanks, for your continuous contribution, help & support. May Almighty Allah shower blessings upon you.--Asikhi (talk) 05:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Please undelete Apache James

I don't believe that it got a fair shake in the AfD. There is solid in-depth third-party coverage of it, see , , , . These were written in 2003-2004, long before the AfD, and easily found by googling. There were only two proponents for the deletion and both voted to delete on the grounds that such sources did not exist, which I hope is now obviously false. Ham Pastrami (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Homeopathy/LEADdiscussion

Hi Scientizzle. You removed the cat from Homeopathy/LEADdiscussion. Soon a bot will tag the article as uncategorized, and another editor will categorize it one more time. Seeing that You are one of the contributors, perhaps You could help find a more appropriate location for this sandbox. – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 17:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

It doesn't even seem active anymore, so I might just delete it... — Scientizzle 01:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

If it is inactive, then please do. – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 09:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Response

Hi Scientizzle from Acleron. I've lurked a long time to see the fantastic efforts in Misplaced Pages but don't feel qualified enough to make a significant contribution to the knowledge base above the normally excellent editors in any topic I have any expertise in. I presume your welcome message was in response to the comments I have made in the Edits sections of three homeopathic related entries. I hope correcting logical and factual errors in these sections doesn't contradict Misplaced Pages policy or custom. If it does, I will reluctantly withdraw.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Acleron (talk • contribs)

You haven't done anything inappropriate. Just try to get comfortable, and please contribute what you can, in discussion and in content. The welcome message contains a lot of useful links. Hope to see you around. Cheers, — Scientizzle 01:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

F. Javier Cevallos

I realize that there was no citation for my comments about the no confidence vote, but I don't know how to add citations. The story was in our school newspaper. Anyways, are you a student a Kutztown? No probably not. So where do you get off changing something like that when you know nothing about it. How about next time sending me a message telling how to cite things. There are times when you certainly should change things, and then other times; like when you have no idea whether something is true or not, that you should just leave things alone. So I'm putting back the edit. If you have a problem with it, please tell me how to cite it. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.55.211 (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully you'll find my reply message useful... — Scientizzle 17:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for posting the helpful stuff on my page and for the welcome to the community! —Preceding unsigned comment added by SplendidConfusion (talk • contribs) 15:27, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome! — Scientizzle 17:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Please cancel an edit violating The 3RR

1. Some days ago, an editor made this edit.
2. On 23 February, at 5:15, the same editor has made his first revert.
3. On the same day, at 22:23, the same editor made his second revert.
4. On that very day, at 22:57, the same editor made his third revert.
5. On the same day, at 23:26, the same editor made his fourth revert.

Please cancel his fourth revert - which violates 3RR. No need to warn him, because I'm sure it was not done on purpose! He's an honest person who is absolutely aware to the 3RR and has always obeyed the 3RR. Eliko (talk) 00:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Violation of RFCU in sockpuppetry case

According to WP:RFCU "Vote fraud where the possible sockpuppet votes do not affect the outcome of the vote" is an "unacceptable request". The users accused of sockpuppetry voted "keep", but the outcome was "delete". Justify why you conducted the request anyway. FeelFreeToBe (talk) 08:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Umm - the RFCU case was filed under category "D", which is suspected vote fraud when the vote was closed, which it was. The SSP case was filed when the vote was open, which is also per policy. The RFCU page shows where each case should be presented and the case code is the likely applicable one. It's still up to the checkuser to determine whether the case should be rejected or accepted based on evidence provided, and that is likely to be based on checkuser policy, not per the RFCU main page which is just a guideline for submitting cases - Alison 05:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the additional explanation, Alison. — Scientizzle 16:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

How do I clear an accusation of Sockpuppetry against me?

My user name is Epicatus. The following message was left by you on my "my talk" page.

"You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/LakeOswego for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Scientizzle 02:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)"

The case has been closed and I cannot edit the page further per instructions on the page.

How do I clear myself of this false accusation?

Thanks,

Epicatus Epictatus‎ (talk · contribs)

Replied... — Scientizzle 22:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Our weekly COTW message from WPOR

Welcome to another wonderful world of WP:ORE COTW. Thanks again to those who lent a hand improving Pinto Colvig and Cooper Spur ski area this past week or so. This week we return to the High importance Stubs, with the mighty Seal of Oregon and former governor and legal superstar Sylvester Pennoyer. To opt out of these messages, or suggest an article, swing by here. Or to stop receiving any WPORE messages just remove your name from the list of members at WP:ORE. Auf Wiedersehen. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

plagiarism

How does one report instances of plagiarism on wikipedia? it may just be case of insufficient attribution or careless borrowing, but I am uncertain how to 'flag' it. EraserGirl (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Fishing Rod

Creamy Army

Hi Scientizzle, thanks for your nice comments here. I agree with your rationale, and if it does end up being a problem I would support a renomination. Cheers! --JayHenry (talk) 05:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Creamy3 et al

Sock puppets? Does no one notice the links?! Scarian 08:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you kindly for your work with the Creamy Army Scientizzle. Better luck next time. Ciao. Creamy3 (talk) 16:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)