Revision as of 15:36, 5 March 2008 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Homeopathy.using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:40, 5 March 2008 edit undoEnric Naval (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,509 edits →March 2008Next edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Homeopathy|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You are creating POV edits that will be reverted. If you want to make significant changes, please take it to ].'' ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 15:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Homeopathy|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''You are creating POV edits that will be reverted. If you want to make significant changes, please take it to ].'' ] <small><sup>] ]</sup></small> 15:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Komelbar, your edits to Homeopathy article are repeating information already on the article and they also give undue weight to the arguments that the water memory is scientifically proved and that homeopathy has effects beyond placebo. Those studies should be down on the article, where the rest of articles are, since most studies show the opposite of those. <s>Also, you are near to breaking the ] rule of not reverting 3 times on the same day the same article</s> Ooops, orange is right, you had already broken it --] (]) 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:40, 5 March 2008
March 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Homeopathy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will 14:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Homeopathy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You are creating POV edits that will be reverted. If you want to make significant changes, please take it to Talk:Homeopathy. OrangeMarlin 15:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Komelbar, your edits to Homeopathy article are repeating information already on the article and they also give undue weight to the arguments that the water memory is scientifically proved and that homeopathy has effects beyond placebo. Those studies should be down on the article, where the rest of articles are, since most studies show the opposite of those.
Also, you are near to breaking the WP:3RR rule of not reverting 3 times on the same day the same articleOoops, orange is right, you had already broken it --Enric Naval (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)