| Revision as of 18:06, 7 March 2008 editLir (talk | contribs)10,238 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:06, 7 March 2008 edit undoLir (talk | contribs)10,238 edits WELL OK I'LL JUST CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT DUMBASSESNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| My ban is not only against the rules of Misplaced Pages, but it has nothing to do with whether or not I am actively contributing to articles (in fact, I can't actively contribute, because of the hostile attitude of corrupt admins), and this ultimately has everything to do with the fact that I have complained about the way some admins treat the common users -- in other words, this ban was politically motivated. Furthermore, it is absurd to claim that I am here causing trouble and making personal attacks, while someone like User:Calton is clearly doing just that, and yet he is never sanctioned for his overtly hostile behavior; meanwhile, whom exactly have I made a personal attack against? As far as I can tell, absolutely nobody. All I want to do is edit the Misplaced Pages like any other user, but it seems some users are more equal than others. Any mis-step we make is used as justification for a ban, while everytime they do something wrong they can quote "Ignore All Rules". --Sheer Hypocrisy-- | My ban is not only against the rules of Misplaced Pages, but it has nothing to do with whether or not I am actively contributing to articles (in fact, I can't actively contribute, because of the hostile attitude of corrupt admins), and this ultimately has everything to do with the fact that I have complained about the way some admins treat the common users -- in other words, this ban was politically motivated. Furthermore, it is absurd to claim that I am here causing trouble and making personal attacks, while someone like User:Calton is clearly doing just that, and yet he is never sanctioned for his overtly hostile behavior; meanwhile, whom exactly have I made a personal attack against? As far as I can tell, absolutely nobody. All I want to do is edit the Misplaced Pages like any other user, but it seems some users are more equal than others. Any mis-step we make is used as justification for a ban, while everytime they do something wrong they can quote "Ignore All Rules". --Sheer Hypocrisy-- | ||
| WELL OK I'LL JUST CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT DUMBASSES, YOU CAN'T STOP ME LOL! You are the ones who wanted me to use this account where you could see me, now you can't; your loss! | WELL OK I'LL JUST CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT DUMBASSES, YOU CAN'T STOP ME LOL! You are the ones who wanted me to use this account where you could see me, now you can't; your loss! Lol, fucking retard wannabe dictators. | ||
| |decline=We're here to write an encyclopedia. You're evidently not. Unless some admin thinks differently, consider this a community ban. Wikilawyering will not work— ]<sup>g</sup> 17:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}} | |decline=We're here to write an encyclopedia. You're evidently not. Unless some admin thinks differently, consider this a community ban. Wikilawyering will not work— ]<sup>g</sup> 17:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
Revision as of 18:06, 7 March 2008
Lir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As far as I know, the correct procedure for blocking someone requires that the individual with a complaint file a request for arbitration; this has not been done, which makes this an excellent example of how certain users are consistently abusing their authority. The arbcom ruling against me allows people to revert controversial edits, but not to unilaterally ban me indefinitely without trial. In any case, when the system allows rogue admins to block users indefinitely without trial, then there is clearly a serious judicial review problem here.
My ban is not only against the rules of Misplaced Pages, but it has nothing to do with whether or not I am actively contributing to articles (in fact, I can't actively contribute, because of the hostile attitude of corrupt admins), and this ultimately has everything to do with the fact that I have complained about the way some admins treat the common users -- in other words, this ban was politically motivated. Furthermore, it is absurd to claim that I am here causing trouble and making personal attacks, while someone like User:Calton is clearly doing just that, and yet he is never sanctioned for his overtly hostile behavior; meanwhile, whom exactly have I made a personal attack against? As far as I can tell, absolutely nobody. All I want to do is edit the Misplaced Pages like any other user, but it seems some users are more equal than others. Any mis-step we make is used as justification for a ban, while everytime they do something wrong they can quote "Ignore All Rules". --Sheer Hypocrisy--
WELL OK I'LL JUST CREATE A NEW ACCOUNT DUMBASSES, YOU CAN'T STOP ME LOL! You are the ones who wanted me to use this account where you could see me, now you can't; your loss! Lol, fucking retard wannabe dictators.
Decline reason:
We're here to write an encyclopedia. You're evidently not. Unless some admin thinks differently, consider this a community ban. Wikilawyering will not work— Doc 17:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.