Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
I'm not sure exactly what the issue is you're tackling at the TFA requests talk page, but if you can't watch the page constantly (to do . . . whatever it is you need to do), I can handle that for you. It'd be nice to have ''Surfer Rosa'' appear on the Main Page for its 20th anniversary, and you've been long overdue an appearance there (For comparison's sake, I've had two articles appear on the Main Page already. This was back when we could nominate any article, and I personally nominated neither. Odd that.). ] (]) 06:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure exactly what the issue is you're tackling at the TFA requests talk page, but if you can't watch the page constantly (to do . . . whatever it is you need to do), I can handle that for you. It'd be nice to have ''Surfer Rosa'' appear on the Main Page for its 20th anniversary, and you've been long overdue an appearance there (For comparison's sake, I've had two articles appear on the Main Page already. This was back when we could nominate any article, and I personally nominated neither. Odd that.). ] (]) 06:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
:There's my three official current projects ('']'', '']'', and ]), but I get distracted easily. As a result I've done a lot of work on ]. There's a few more Replacements articles I should send you. Remind me to if I don't e-mail them to you over the weekend. ] (]) 22:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
:There's my three official current projects ('']'', '']'', and ]), but I get distracted easily. As a result I've done a lot of work on ]. There's a few more Replacements articles I should send you. Remind me to if I don't e-mail them to you over the weekend. ] (]) 22:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
== Munkey talk page/ facts straight ==
I proposed that some content was unsuitable for the general pubilic. ] proposed that my view was wrong and added that given a choice between a book about a retired art historian and a book about a sexual pervert he would "damn well know which one" he would prefer. I naturally assumed he was implying that his preference was for the book about perversion. You have protected my talk page to prevent me "calling Milburn a pervert". I would believe that a person expressing taste for books of perversion ''are'' perverts. Can you explain this to me further without your suggestion that reading the book about the sexual pervert may be of some value or can you please remove the protection from the (my) page? ] (]) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the article is once again receiving heavy vandalism from IP users. If it isn't too much trouble, could you perhaps protect it again? NSR77C04:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Alphaman
I noticed that you deleted the Alphaman article on July 12, 2007. I looked up what "prod" meant in this context. Am I correct in assuming that you proposed deletion of the article, then no one responded within 5 days, so you went ahead and deleted it?
The fact that it wasn't a long article, that if I'm correct in assuming that no one objected within 5 days, and the fact that it took me 8 months to realize it was deleted seems to confirm that it wasn't notable.
Still, I think it's notable in relation to the rouge-like games. And I'm asking now because today there was some information I remember was on the Misplaced Pages page and no where else.
I was going to ask if the page was truely deleted everywhere, but while I was looking I found the page archive on the Internet Archive http://web.archive.org (and found the information I was looking for). So now I'm more just asking if it was deleted simply because it was short and no one objected to its deletion.
Featured Article queue
I'm not sure exactly what the issue is you're tackling at the TFA requests talk page, but if you can't watch the page constantly (to do . . . whatever it is you need to do), I can handle that for you. It'd be nice to have Surfer Rosa appear on the Main Page for its 20th anniversary, and you've been long overdue an appearance there (For comparison's sake, I've had two articles appear on the Main Page already. This was back when we could nominate any article, and I personally nominated neither. Odd that.). WesleyDodds (talk) 06:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I proposed that some content was unsuitable for the general pubilic. User:J Milburn proposed that my view was wrong and added that given a choice between a book about a retired art historian and a book about a sexual pervert he would "damn well know which one" he would prefer. I naturally assumed he was implying that his preference was for the book about perversion. You have protected my talk page to prevent me "calling Milburn a pervert". I would believe that a person expressing taste for books of perversion are perverts. Can you explain this to me further without your suggestion that reading the book about the sexual pervert may be of some value or can you please remove the protection from the (my) page? ThisMunkey (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
