| Revision as of 07:46, 11 March 2008 view sourceRossrs (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers34,076 edits thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:46, 11 March 2008 view source Rossrs (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers34,076 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| <!------------------------------Please place new talk below this line------------------------------> | <!------------------------------Please place new talk below this line------------------------------> | ||
| ==thank you== | |||
| :::Thank you Wildhartlivie and Pinkadelica so much for all the effort you've put into this article today. I'm sorry it's turned out to be such a hornet's nest, but I appreciate that you've both taken action. I am completely sure that this is the same serial-vandal that has been doing this nonsense for over a year. repeats my edit summary verbatim but without context - an old trick, and several edits including contain the same mangled English as previous edits, plus there is a complete inability to distinguish between POV and cited opinion (also nothing new). I'm so sure it's the same editor. Thanks again. You two are the best, and I look forward to speaking to you in a few weeks. (Wildhartlivie, I can't believe he threatened to have you blocked....) Cheers ] (]) 07:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | :::Thank you Wildhartlivie and Pinkadelica so much for all the effort you've put into this article today. I'm sorry it's turned out to be such a hornet's nest, but I appreciate that you've both taken action. I am completely sure that this is the same serial-vandal that has been doing this nonsense for over a year. repeats my edit summary verbatim but without context - an old trick, and several edits including contain the same mangled English as previous edits, plus there is a complete inability to distinguish between POV and cited opinion (also nothing new). I'm so sure it's the same editor. Thanks again. You two are the best, and I look forward to speaking to you in a few weeks. (Wildhartlivie, I can't believe he threatened to have you blocked....) Cheers ] (]) 07:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:46, 11 March 2008
Welcome!
Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for September has been published. October's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.
There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
- Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
- Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Misplaced Pages. Check it out!
- Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!
 Archives |
Helpful templates
Just cut an paste them when you need them from this page, I keep them on my user page. The dates are always formatted correctly, just remember to increment the date, as often as possible, as I sometimes forget to do.
- <ref>{{cite web |url= |title= |accessdate=2007-10-31 |quote= |publisher= }}</ref>
- <ref>{{cite book |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |year= |publisher= |quote= | url= |isbn= }}</ref>
- <ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title= |url= |quote= |publisher=] |date= |accessdate=2007-10-31 }}</ref>
thank you
- Thank you Wildhartlivie and Pinkadelica so much for all the effort you've put into this article today. I'm sorry it's turned out to be such a hornet's nest, but I appreciate that you've both taken action. I am completely sure that this is the same serial-vandal that has been doing this nonsense for over a year. this edit repeats my edit summary verbatim but without context - an old trick, and several edits including this one contain the same mangled English as previous edits, plus there is a complete inability to distinguish between POV and cited opinion (also nothing new). I'm so sure it's the same editor. Thanks again. You two are the best, and I look forward to speaking to you in a few weeks. (Wildhartlivie, I can't believe he threatened to have you blocked....) Cheers Rossrs (talk) 07:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)