Civil war: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:15, 14 March 2008 view sourceToddst1 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,759 editsm Reverted 1 edit by OXxjakexXo identified as vandalism to last revision by Sceptre. (TW)← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:21, 14 March 2008 view source 70.109.137.166 (talk) ←Replaced page with 'There was no civil war. School teaches you things that are not true.'Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
			There was no civil war. School teaches you things that are not true.
	{{two other uses\|the definition of the specific type of war\|civil wars in history\|List of civil wars}}
	{{history of war}}
	A '''civil war''' is a ] in which parties of the same ], ] or ]ality fight each other for control of ].

	Some civil wars are categorized as ]s when major societal restructuring is a possible outcome of the conflict. An ], whether successful or not, is likely to be classified as a civil war by some historians if, and only if, organized ] fight conventional ]s. Other historians state the criterion for a civil war is that there must be prolonged violence between organized factions or defined regions of a ] (conventionally fought or not). {{Fact\|date=April 2007}} A "rebellion" is generally (though not neccessarily) an armed uprising against the current government that is unsuccessful.

	Ultimately the distinction between a "civil war" and a "revolution" or any other name may be arbitrary, and is determined by usage. However, the distinction between a "civil war" and "revolution" can be recognizable. The successful civil war of the 1640s in England which led to the (temporary) overthrow of the ] represented by ] became known as the ], however it has also been described, by ] and some historians, as the English Revolution.

	In ] the conflict between ] rebel forces adhering to a pseudo-] ideology and the ] ] government is generally known as the 'Taiping Rebellion', though it was mostly fought between armies. The term 'Taiping Revolution' is also used periodically. On the other hand the ] also saw extensive fighting which could be characterised as 'civil war' in places such as ] and in a number of cities in the country's south, though as an overall descriptor of the events of ] to ] the term 'revolution' is probably more apt.

	In the ], the successful insurgency of the 1770s in ], which featured organized armies fighting battles, came to be known as the ]. The unsuccessful insurgency of the 1860s by ] against the ] backed by ], which also featured organized armies fighting battles, came to be known as the ]. While hostilities were still ongoing, most ] preferred to call the conflict the ''Second American Revolution'' or something very similar, and had the Confederacy triumphed the war would likely have come to be known as a ''Revolution'' and/or a ''War of Independence.'' In the United States, and in American-dominated sources, the term 'the civil war' usually means the American Civil War, with other civil wars noted or inferred from context.

	==Definition==

	Merriam Webster's dictionary defines civil war as "a war between opposing groups of the same country".

	===Scholarly Opinion===

	A civil war is "a violent conflict within a country fought by organized groups that aim to take power at the center or in a region, or to change government policies".<ref> J. FEARSON, "Iraq's Civil War" in ''Foreign Affairs'', March/April 2007, </ref> Everyday usage of the term does not entail a clear threshold for how much violence is necessary to qualify a conflict as a civil war, as opposed to ] or low-level political strife. Scholars use two criteria: the warring groups must be from the same country and fighting for control of the political center, control over a ] state or to force a major change in policy. Their second criterion, used by some academics, is that at least 1,000 people must have been killed in total, with at least 100 from each side.<ref> Edward Wong, "A Matter of Definition: What Makes a Civil War, and Who Declares It So?" ''New York Times'' November 26, 2006 online at </ref> The ], a dataset widely used by scholars of conflict, classifies civil wars as having over 1000 war-related casualties per year of conflict. This rate is a small fraction of the millions killed in the ] and ], for example, but excludes several highly publicized conflicts, such as ] of ] and the struggle of the ] in ]-era ]. Based on the 1000 casualties per year criterion, there were 213 civil wars from 1816 to 1997, 104 of which occurred from 1944 to 1997.<ref>Ann Hironaka, ''Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War'', Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 2005, p. 3, ISBN 0674015320</ref>

	===International Definition===

	The Final Record of the ], (Volume II-B, p. 121) does not specifically define the term ‘civil war’. It did, however, describe the criteria that separate any act committed by force of arms (anarchy, terrorism, or plain banditry) from those qualifying as ‘armed conflict not of an international character’ which includes civil wars. Among those conditions listed are these four basic requirements.

	• The party in revolt must be in possession of a part of the national territory.

	• The insurgent civil authority must exercise de facto authority over the population within the determinate portion of the national territory.

	• The insurgents must have some amount of recognition as a belligerent.

	• The legal Government is “obliged to have recourse to the regular military forces against insurgents organized as military.”

	The ] (ICRC) further clarified Article 9 of the ]. They stated that the nature of these armed conflicts, not of an international character “generally refer to conflicts with armed forces on either side which are in many respects similar to an international war, but take place within the confines of a single country.”<ref></ref>

	===U.S. Military Definition===

	The ] has adopted the principles set by the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva for their definition of civil war. However, it does include an additional requirement for identifiable armed forces. The December 1990 version of ] (]s in ]) defines a civil war as:

	“A war between factions of the same country; there are five criteria for international recognition of this status: the contestants must control territory, have a functioning government, enjoy some foreign recognition, have identifiable regular armed forces, and engage in major military operations.”

	===NATO Definition===

	] does not directly define civil war. However, in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Glossary of Terms and Definitions (Organisation Du Traite De L'Atlantique Nord Glossaire De Terms Et Definitions) NATO does provide a reference for what is not classified as a civil war. The manual states that 'civil disturbance' is defined as "group acts of violence and disorder prejudicial to public law and order".<ref>http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/other_pubs/aap_6v.pdf</ref>

	This definition supports the premise shared by the Geneva Convention, ICRC, and the U.S. Military that a civil war is a higher level of violence commensurate with that of a conventional war of movement.

	==Premodern civil wars==
	===Religious conflicts===
	Civil wars that are fought over religion have tended to occur more in ] than in ] societies; one explanation is that the latter tend to be more "flexible" in terms of dogma, allowing for some latitude in belief. In ] through the ], the Christianity of the great bulk of the population was influenced by pagan tradition. With the great majority of the population ], access to the ] was limited and led to a significant amount of ] between Christian and pagan elements. With religion so loosely applied, it was rare for people to feel particularly oppressed by it. There were periodic appearances of ], such as that of the ], which led to violence, but historians tend to view these to be the product of ]s rather than themselves motivators of a civil war.

	As religions tended to become more rigidly defined and understood by their followers, inter-religious tensions generally increased. The rise of ] witnessed a rash of uprisings against non-Islamic rulers soon after its appearance. Subsequent Islamic history has been marked by repeated civil conflicts, mostly stemming out of the ]-] divide. In Europe the ] had a similar effect, sparking years of both civil and international wars of religion. Civil wars between ] and ] consumed France in the ], the Netherlands during the ], Germany during the ]. Religious disputes among Protestant sects also played a role in the ], while official persecution of Catholics during the ] spurred the ]. In China an attempt at religious revolution caused the bloodiest civil war of all time, the ]. Another Chinese rebellion was the ].

	===Revolutions===
	A revolution is generally seen as a civil war fought over issues of ideology, over how power should be organized and distributed, not merely over which individuals hold it. The classic example of a revolution, and by some arguments the first is the ], which is seen to have pitted the middle class and urban poor of France against the aristocracy and monarchy. Some argue that revolutions are a modern continuation of the peasant revolts of the past. Unlike peasant revolts, however, revolutions are almost always led by members of the educated, but disaffected, middle class who then rally the large mass of the population to their cause. Others see ideology as merely replacing religion as a justification and motivation for violence that is fundamentally caused by socio-economic factors. To be successful revolutions almost always require use of armed force and sometimes escalate to a civil war, such as in the ]. In some cases, such as the French and ]s the revolutionaries succeed in gaining power through a quick coup or localized uprising, but a civil war results from ]ary forces organizing to crush the revolution as the strong Royalist support in the ].

	===Separatist revolts===
	One of the most common causes of civil wars, especially in the post-] world has been separatist violence. ] can be seen as similar to both a religion and an ideology as a justification for war rather than a root cause of conflict. All modern states attempt to hold a monopoly on internal military force. For separatist civil wars to break out thus either the national army must fracture along ethnic, religious, or national lines as happened in ]; or more commonly a modern separatist conflict takes the form of ] with separatists lightly armed and disorganized, but with the support of the local population such groups can be hard to defeat. This is the route taken by most liberation groups in colonies, as well as forces in areas such as ] and ]. Regional differences may be enhanced by differing economies, as in the ]. National minorities are also often minorities and wars of religion may link closely into separatist conflicts.

	===Coups===
	], in Spanish ], are by definition quick blows to the top of a government that do not result in the widespread violence of a civil war. On occasion a failed coup, or one that is only half successful, can precipitate a civil war between factions. These wars often quickly try to pull in larger themes of ideology, nationalism, or religion to try to win supporters among the general population for a conflict that in essence is an intra-elite competition for power.

	==Reasons for war==
	Almost every nation has minority groups, religious plurality, and ideological divisions, but not all plunge into civil war. ]s have long searched for what variables trigger civil wars. In the modern world, most civil wars occur in nations that are poor, autocratic, and regionally divided. However, the United States was not poor at the time of its bloody civil war.

	Some models to explain the occurrence of civil wars stress the importance of change and transition. According to one such line of reasoning, the ] was caused by the growing economic power of the North relative to the South; the ] by the upsetting of the delicate demographic balance by the increase in the Shi'ite population; the ] by the growing power of the middle class and merchants at the expense of the aristocracy.

	Competition for resources and wealth within a society is seen as a frequent cause for civil wars, however economic gain is rarely the justification espoused by the participants. ] historians stress economic and class factors arguing that civil wars are caused by imperialist rulers battling each other for greater power, and using tools such as nationalism and religion to delude people into joining them. Also, ] proved that the violence observed in civil war can come from spurious reasons.

	Not only are the causes of civil wars widely studied and debated, but their persistence is also seen as an important issue. Many civil wars have proved especially intractable, dragging on for many decades. One contributing factor is that civil wars often become ]s for outside powers that fund their partisans and thus encourage further violence.

	Research related to the ] have studied civil wars and democracy. Research shows that the most democratic and the most authoritarian states have few civil wars, and intermediate regimes the most. The probability for a civil war is also increased by political change, regardless whether toward greater democracy or greater autocracy. Intermediate regimes continue to be the most prone to civil war, regardless of the time since the political change. In the long run, since intermediate regimes are less stable than autocracies, which in turn are less stable than democracies, durable democracy is the most probable end-point of the process of ] . The fall of ] and the increase in the number of democratic states were accompanied by a sudden and dramatic decline in total warfare, interstate wars, ] wars, ] wars, and the number of ] and ]s .

	==See also==
	*]
	*]
	*]
	*]

	==References==
	{{reflist}}

	==Bibliography==
	* Ali, Taisier Mohamed Ahmed and Robert O. Matthews, eds. ''Civil Wars in Africa: roots and resolution'' (1999), 322 pages
	* Mats Berdal and David M. Malone, ''Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars'' (Lynne Rienner, 2000).
	* Paul Collier, ''Breaking the Conflict Trap: civil war and development policy'' World Bank (2003) - 320 pages
	* Stathis Kalyvas, "'New' and 'Old' Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?" ''World Politics'' 54, no. 1 (2001): 99-118.
	* David Lake and Donald Rothchild, eds. ''The International Spread of Ethnic Conflict: Fear, Diffusion, and Escalation'' (Princeton University Press, 1996).
	* Roy Licklider, "The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945--1993," ''American Political Science Review'' 89, no. 3 (summer 1995): pp 681-690.
	* Andrew Mack, "Civil War: Academic Research and the Policy Community," ''Journal of Peace Research'' 39, no. 5 (2002): pp. 515-525.
	* David M. Malone and Mats R. Berdal. ''Greed and Grievance: economic agendas in civil wars'' (2000), 251 pages
	* David T. Mason and Patrick 3. Fett, "How Civil Wars End: A Rational Choice Approach," ''Journal of Conflict Resolution'' 40, no. 4 (fall 1996): 546-568.
	* Patrick M. Regan. ''Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict'' (2000) 172 pages
	* Stephen John et al, eds. ''Ending Civil Wars: The Implementation of Peace Agreements'' (2002), 729 pages
	* Monica Duffy Toft, ''The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory'' (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003). ISBN 0-691-12383-7.
	* Barbara F. Walter, ''Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars'' (Princeton University Press, 2002),
	* Elisabeth Jean Wood; "Civil Wars: What We Don't Know," ''Global Governance,'' Vol. 9, 2003 pp 247+

	==External link==
	*
	* Information about the English civil war fought between 1455 and 1487.
	*
	*

	]

	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]
	]

Revision as of 20:21, 14 March 2008

There was no civil war. School teaches you things that are not true.