Revision as of 14:18, 23 March 2008 editCambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators253,295 editsm Reverted edits by 121.90.69.140 (talk) to last version by Bongwarrior← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:29, 23 March 2008 edit undo121.90.236.225 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<table style="padding: 5px; width: 100%; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin-bottom: 4px; clear: left; -moz-border-radius: 6px;"> | <table style="padding: 5px; width: 100%; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA; margin-bottom: 4px; clear: left; -moz-border-radius: 6px;"> | ||
<tr><td> | <tr><td> | ||
{{User:Bongwarrior/talkheader}}You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. | |||
{{User:Bongwarrior/talkheader}} | |||
Revision as of 14:29, 23 March 2008
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Unsigned messages will likely be removed. For messages left here, I will usually respond here. If I leave a message on your talk page, I will watch for a response there. Bongwarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: your reason hereNotes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting
New admirerMakes you laugh doesn't it. :P Rudget. 11:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Heads upRFCN right here. I guess it has to be seen/dealt with —αlεx•mullεr 18:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
SockpuppetHi, I believe I have found an obvious sockpuppet: You blocked User:Kingkong21212 who consistently vandalized the Dude article. Also linked to this username is User:Kingkong81818. You may want to consider temporarily IP blocking this user. Thanks. PseudoOne 06:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Layla27/Ruby Tuesday et alI've filed a checkuser report on this one - it's the third RFCU, and I'm getting tired of wrangling with him. Acroterion (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
WrongAs any intellligent human being could see i reverted the "Hell" Edit as it was an accident. Please be sure you know what you are talking about before you sent threatening messages to people. THNAK YOU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Desparity997 (talk • contribs) 07:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
why revert my edityou knew that stat is questionable i find the asterisk quite justified --128.113.193.133 (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
ObrigadoThanks for reverting the vandalisme on my userpage. I by inertia in choosing between flaming and blocking vandals. скоморохъ 01:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC) LostHelp! The nonsense article H.E.R.M.Y.?? you deleted was the content moved (via vandalism) from Lost (TV series), can you get it back??? TheRhani (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
|