Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rjd0060: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:57, 30 March 2008 editRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits change← Previous edit Revision as of 14:34, 31 March 2008 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 6d) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 5.Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
</center>}} </center>}}
<!-------- DO NOT ADD ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE --------> <!-------- DO NOT ADD ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE -------->

== Question? ==

Is it wrong for a user (registered or not) to change the replies that one person lives on their own talk page? ] did that after I left a kind reply. The change here and his reply to me after he changed my reply . I feel really offended by this it is like he/she put words in my mouth. ''']] ]''' 04:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
:Thanks again. I will be sure to do that in the future. Thanks again :) ''']] ]''' 18:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
:I just wanted to let you know that ] has vandalized ] again. I have given this user a only warning for their edits. I also reverted some of his comments on your talk page as they were acts of vandalism. (ie. changing my signature and calling me swear-paints) ''']] ]''' 20:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

== Question 2 ==

Why was I indefinitely blocked? Was it because of username? And when will new account be activated and old account expire after a requested name change? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:00, 24 March 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Hello! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

] (]) has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
</div><!-- Template:smile -->
16:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)


== Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected == == Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected ==

Revision as of 14:34, 31 March 2008

Please leave new messages at the bottom of the page, or you can E-Mail me .
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.





Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5


This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected

The D2X-XL chapter of the Descent 2 article has been a target for plain vandalism or malevolent changes of its content for over a year. The issue has just started to get heated today, when a few people involved with the Descent community had decided to take this to a new level and mark the chapter as advertisement, restoring the mark whenever I remove it. You may want to take a look at that chapter. If you decide it's an advertisement, I will accept the decision. The people currently at work are however acting out of a deep personal resentment against me, and the Misplaced Pages entry is only a vehicle for their destructivity. FYI: Here is a link to a thread of the biggest English speaking Descent community forum, where the issue is discussed: http://www.descentbb.net/viewforum.php?f=37

Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talkcontribs) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You might want to talk to the person who actually declined the protection request, User:Master of Puppets. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ok. I'm pretty much a Misplaced Pages noob, thanks.

Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talkcontribs) 17:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies

Regarding the NFRA dispute in the mediation cabal, do I need to be doing anything else to facilitate the dialogue? CorpITGuy (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Question

Your response at WP:RFA. Does that mean my talk page is semi-protected or were just saying that one IP was blocked? AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

NM, while writing this I see you posted at RFA. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Freaky

Check the log. How weird is that? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Graphology

Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) still has troubles understanding what vandalism means: "When the edits are deliberately disruptive, then it is vandalism." 190.51.135.192 (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (see his talk page)

While that statement is true, those edits aren't vandalism, and he fails to assume good faith. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Helen Shivers

I see you deleted the article, but you've yet to close the AFD. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: 21656???!!!

Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 / ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

SPA

I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:ABUSE

I know the policy is to only accept complaints about IPs blocked at least 5 times, but I'm seeing quite a few complaints about IPs with three and four blocks. Should I decline those, or would it be okay to accept them? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment from some guy

Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talkcontribs)