| Revision as of 14:34, 31 March 2008 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 6d) to User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 5.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:06, 31 March 2008 edit undoNeofcon (talk | contribs)873 edits →Comment from some guyNext edit → | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! ] 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! ] 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ==Thank you== | |||
| Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--] (]) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:06, 31 March 2008
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.
 Archives |
|
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Descent 2 - semi protection of D2X-XL chapter rejected
The D2X-XL chapter of the Descent 2 article has been a target for plain vandalism or malevolent changes of its content for over a year. The issue has just started to get heated today, when a few people involved with the Descent community had decided to take this to a new level and mark the chapter as advertisement, restoring the mark whenever I remove it. You may want to take a look at that chapter. If you decide it's an advertisement, I will accept the decision. The people currently at work are however acting out of a deep personal resentment against me, and the Misplaced Pages entry is only a vehicle for their destructivity. FYI: Here is a link to a thread of the biggest English speaking Descent community forum, where the issue is discussed: http://www.descentbb.net/viewforum.php?f=37
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- You might want to talk to the person who actually declined the protection request, User:Master of Puppets. - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Ah, ok. I'm pretty much a Misplaced Pages noob, thanks.
Karx11erx (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Karx11erx (talk • contribs) 17:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-03-19 National Federation of Republican Assemblies
Regarding the NFRA dispute in the mediation cabal, do I need to be doing anything else to facilitate the dialogue? CorpITGuy (talk) 23:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Question
Your response at WP:RFA. Does that mean my talk page is semi-protected or were just saying that one IP was blocked? AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- NM, while writing this I see you posted at RFA. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Freaky
Check the log. How weird is that? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Graphology
Pseudo daoist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) still has troubles understanding what vandalism means: "When the edits are deliberately disruptive, then it is vandalism." 190.51.135.192 (talk) 01:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC) (see his talk page)
- While that statement is true, those edits aren't vandalism, and he fails to assume good faith. - Rjd0060 (talk) 01:13, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Helen Shivers
I see you deleted the article, but you've yet to close the AFD. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist (talk) 09:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: 21656???!!!
Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 / ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
SPA
I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:ABUSE
I know the policy is to only accept complaints about IPs blocked at least 5 times, but I'm seeing quite a few complaints about IPs with three and four blocks. Should I decline those, or would it be okay to accept them? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment from some guy
Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs)
Thank you
Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--Neofcon (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)