Revision as of 17:24, 26 March 2008 editStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,085 edits →Review of Barack Obama's status as a featured article: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:46, 31 March 2008 edit undoPAVA11 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,030 edits →Review of Barack Obama's status as a featured article: newNext edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. ] (]) 17:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | ] has been nominated for a ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are ]. Reviewers' concerns are ]. ] (]) 17:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
I like how we get no answer to . Pathetic. ''']''' ''']''' 18:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:46, 31 March 2008
Please sign your comments using four tildes ( |
Please respect etiquette and assume good faith. Also be nice and remain civil. |
kinda funny
you're in the national media bitching out Andy for POV. hi-larious... 72.0.180.2 (talk) 06:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Blogs as sources
FYI in general, MSM blog entries are sometimes allowed as sources, see WP:V footnote 5. This has become common in this presidential election, e.g. MSNBC's FirstRead, the NY Times' The Caucus, and others of that ilk are okay to use. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Look at something like this. It's a straight NYT news story, not an opinion piece, but it happens to be filed under their politics blog. Same with this. There's no reason these can't be used as WP:RS. That's the trend that footnote 5 is covering. I'm not saying this with respect to any particular edit you've made, just as a general FYI, because some editors are under the impression that nothing ever associated with a blog is allowed. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Review of Barack Obama's status as a featured article
Barack Obama has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Stifle (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I like how we get no answer to this. Pathetic. Grsz 11 18:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)