| Revision as of 15:03, 3 April 2008 editAngelo De La Paz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,131 editsm →April 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:11, 3 April 2008 edit undoHerunar (talk | contribs)863 editsm rv. By what fucking definition is that vandalism?Next edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| The edit I was objecting to was . Apologies for reverting both your edits - I hadn't noticed the second one while considering the first. But the first edit is pure ] and a misrepresentation - Clinton never promised to quit if she lost both Ohio and Texas and your implication that she went bacl on her word is a clear violation of ]. Please be more careful in your additions to ], and please pay particualr attention to ] and provide proper sources for your assertions. Thanks, ] 12:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | The edit I was objecting to was . Apologies for reverting both your edits - I hadn't noticed the second one while considering the first. But the first edit is pure ] and a misrepresentation - Clinton never promised to quit if she lost both Ohio and Texas and your implication that she went bacl on her word is a clear violation of ]. Please be more careful in your additions to ], and please pay particualr attention to ] and provide proper sources for your assertions. Thanks, ] 12:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == April 2008 == | |||
| ] The <span class="plainlinks"></span> (the summary table) you made to ] constitutes ], and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the ] for testing. Thanks. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> ] (]) 15:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:11, 3 April 2008
January 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Opinion polling for the Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Opinion polling for the Democratic Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008 was changed by Herunar (c) (t) deleting 24410 characters on 2008-01-08T03:54:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: Above warning is false positive. Herunar (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Falun Gong
Hes gone over the 3 revert rule. Just report him to an admin. ʄ!•¿talk? 14:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Civilization
Hi! The contents you reverted back on the article was disputed for a long time, and then removed, and later an anonymous editor put it back on (later with new references). However I removed it and pointed out the references was referring to a legendary founding date, the anonymous editor then changed the contents him/herself. Put it on the talk page for discussion if you like.--TheLeopard (talk) 18:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hi Herunar! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Original research
Please note that while we are permitted to add information to pages like Michelle Remembers, edits like this one, which add unsourced analysis to a page, are prohibited by our policy on no original research. Though the claims in Michelle Remembers are absurd, and this precludes the book being used as a reliable source to justify any information on any other page, that is not sufficient to draw a conclusion for the reader on the veracity of the books contents. If you can find a source to justify the statement, it can be replaced. Otherwise, I regret to say it is inappropriate for the page. WLU (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- A question of sick fascination (I don't really care 'cause you reverted your revert) but what was your original intent with this edit? Did you undo the wrong edit? WLU (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Justin Timberlake
Hi. Regarding your edit summary on this edit, a citation would normally be needed for such claims as selling over 50 million copies or about being the third best-selling "boyband" in history, not about an appearance at the Super Bowl. But it's all good. I'm not gonna revert it again. The only reason the original edit caught my attention in the first place was that it was listed as a minor edit, which it really isn't. Cheers. -- Taroaldo (talk) 17:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Tibet on ITN
Which proposal are you talking about? This one? I don't agree or disagree with it, I haven't made up my mind yet. But even if I had, I'm not the only one involved in this discussion, so I won't act unilaterally. Aecis 13:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Barack Obama
The edit I was objecting to was this one. Apologies for reverting both your edits - I hadn't noticed the second one while considering the first. But the first edit is pure original research and a misrepresentation - Clinton never promised to quit if she lost both Ohio and Texas and your implication that she went bacl on her word is a clear violation of WP:NPOV. Please be more careful in your additions to articles like this, and please pay particualr attention to WP:V and provide proper sources for your assertions. Thanks, Gwernol 12:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)