| Revision as of 01:51, 5 April 2008 edit217.44.9.134 (talk) →Re: 21656???!!!← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:05, 5 April 2008 edit undoRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits Undid revision 203429634 by 217.44.9.134 (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| </center>}} | </center>}} | ||
| <!-------- DO NOT ADD ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE --------> | <!-------- DO NOT ADD ANYTHING ABOVE THIS LINE --------> | ||
| ====Suspected Sockpuppeteer Turns Out to Be a Human==== | |||
| Shocking news break. It turns out that the person who originally supplied the information in ISM is me! A real | |||
| person.... not a 'sock puppeteer.' There are no socks and no puppets. Just a real person who thought that a | |||
| business was significant enough to warrant a pace on Misplaced Pages. Someone who actually understands the business he is | |||
| in, unlike the editors, who have no experience in the field whatsoever. | |||
| It turns out- or so we can surmise, that there are lots of people who want to learn about this company. Oh no! | |||
| This can't be! It's a business... not an encyclopedic fact! | |||
| But an encyclopedia like Misplaced Pages should include everything in the world. otherwise, why does it exist? | |||
| Encyclopedia Britannica and the Oxford Encyclopedia are perfectly sufficient. | |||
| Geekish editors have said that listing this company is 'blatant advertising.' Yet other advertising companies, like | |||
| Modernista, BBDO, DDB, Ogilvy, etc. are all here... blatant advertising. So, how big does a company have to be to | |||
| be listed on Wiki? The answer- there is no answer. It's all up to the whims of people who have no knowledge nor | |||
| experience in business, who call themselves Carbuncle, Smeff, Dongfart, and the rest. This is surely detrimental to | |||
| the Wiki. | |||
| Why do people have such a Pyongyang attitude towards this? The very idea of limiting what is shown here- censoring | |||
| pure facts arbitrarily- is against the very idea of a global Wiki. The great big idea is that this site is | |||
| developed by the people of the world, and includes all the things that the published encyclopedias, which have been | |||
| around for hundreds of years, do not or cannot include. | |||
| To my mind, and all the other sane, normal people of the world, this is all ridiculous. | |||
| Please cite the arguments of What Wiki is Not and all the rest. It is a shortcut to thinking. And clearly there is | |||
| very little thinking here. | |||
| I have had repeated emails from people around the world asking why they cannot find ISM on Misplaced Pages, and many from | |||
| people who either wanted to add information on the company or were looking for information for research. Everyone | |||
| was rebuffed. What kind of person would do this- what kind of person would sit in their little room, hiding | |||
| information from others, and trying to keep reality away at any cost? Sock Puppets? Suspicious users? Legal | |||
| threats? What kind of cowardly fool says these things without simply engaging in a dialogue with the person who | |||
| originally wrote the article and who always- ALWAYS - asked for editor input and support? | |||
| Go on- look at the history. You will see that editor input was always taken at first, despite the fact that all | |||
| editors here are wholly unqualified to make a decision on this subject. When asked to explain themselves, no one | |||
| had the nous to do so. Delicious Carbuncle, BlueBoy, Todd1, Fisher Queen, etc. All refused to answer for their | |||
| actions. Cowards and buffoons who have no sense, courage, nor intelligence. | |||
| Anyone who makes an attack on another person, as these 'editors' have, and runs away without facing the person they | |||
| have attacked, is not deserving of their powers. | |||
| I am now convinced that Misplaced Pages, despite it's noble origins, is just a place for fools to feel power in a world | |||
| where they are unable to have any in reality. Go ahead and add your ridiculous little code to me and my site. You | |||
| have no argument and have no intelligence- if you think you do, face me like a real human- talk, discuss, and the | |||
| rest. Or be a true Wiki editor and make a stupid, sarcastic comment and run away... hiding... and never respond to | |||
| your comments. | |||
| Cheers, | |||
| Kevin Nicholas | |||
| Known as kmnicholas | |||
| or ismboston | |||
| and, yes, I live in England- of you bothered to ask | |||
| and my mobile phone number is 07791 410 501 | |||
| so stop making out that I'm hiding or tricking anyone. I'm, here. And I'll meet you, face to face, any | |||
| time.01:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: 21656???!!! == | == Re: 21656???!!! == | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 5 April 2008
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.
 Archives |
|
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 6 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Re: 21656???!!!
Thanks, dude. I wonder if it was a vandal with some sort of agenda against me...maybe I should point them to WP:21655 is way too smart to be fooled by that sort of trickery. 21655 / ʃign 17:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
SPA
I am only an SPA because Don Murphy has harassed editors in the past when it comes to editing his article. For instance, H left because of this harassment. I explained my goal in editing as a SPA at Talk:Don Murphy/Archive2 as well as at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Don Murphy and Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Don Murphy. Please try to assume good faith that I am trying to establish Don Murphy's notability without being harassed. RTFA (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
WP:ABUSE
I know the policy is to only accept complaints about IPs blocked at least 5 times, but I'm seeing quite a few complaints about IPs with three and four blocks. Should I decline those, or would it be okay to accept them? GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment from some guy
Do you see.... I have now got my own account... haha! And I have not vandalised anything.... just shows you that it wasn't me who was doing it!!!!! and I am a member of the Big Brother thing!!! Mikey-is-Lost 13:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs)
Some GUY!!!!!! I am that person who you kept blocking for no reason what so ever............ remember !!! it wasnt even me who was deleting things.... have you got memory loss or somthin????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 17:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- I still have no idea who you are. Want to give me your old username? - Rjd0060 (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I just had an ip address..... how can you not remember me...... my friend like changed that alucard persons comment he left on my talk page.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey-is-lost (talk • contribs) 18:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Though it may be because im not using my home computer that I was blocked, I still send my thanks.--Neofcon (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Kitten?
You can has kitten? 
нмŵוτнτ 15:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Big Brother Kids (U.S.)
Look at this. There is an article named Big Brother Kids (U.S.). Nice April Fools joke isn't it. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 11:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I figured, someone really loves April Fools :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
Cream (talk) has put a trout your back! The Trout promotes playfulness and hopefully this one has made your day worse. You have no choice but to spread it to other editors! Happy April Fools' Day!
Add this {{subst:AprilFoools}} to their talk page with a friendly fish. 14:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Block evasion
A user you blocked for 3RR yesterday, 70.108.82.109, started editing from another IP, 70.108.103.64, before the block was up and is continuing their disruptive editing. I don't like to be a tattletale but sometimes you gotta. —Hello, Control 17:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008
| WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter - April 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
- The above newsletter was delivered by an automatic bot because you are registered on the WikiProject Big Brother spamlist. Please feel free to remove yourself if you do not wish to receive these messages anymore.
→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 14:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Birlinn unblock
Could you please be a little more careful? You just unblocked this person so that they could change their name to: the same name (a corporate one) that was blocked in the first place! --Orange Mike | Talk 15:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, excrement eventuates. It turned out well, fortunately. Thanks for trying to help. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:Lectures on the 6th
Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder... Xavexgoem (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Request
You semi-protected my user page. Thank you. But now, I'd appreciate it if you unprotected. Or should I just undo your edit? Thanks. Me what do u want? Your Hancock Please 00:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
House Calls article finished
I finally have finished the House Calls article. It is detailed and is loaded down with verifiable references. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- It even has a nice shinny logo as well :) ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 20:46, 4 April 2008 (UTC)