Revision as of 03:50, 6 April 2008 editFranamax (talk | contribs)18,113 edits →"Random" question (nyuk nyuk): new section← Previous edit |
Revision as of 14:20, 6 April 2008 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 55h) to User talk:Random832/Archive 5.Next edit → |
Line 112: |
Line 112: |
|
Why does this put user pages in cat Temp user pages? ''] ]'', 03:22 ] ] (GMT). |
|
Why does this put user pages in cat Temp user pages? ''] ]'', 03:22 ] ] (GMT). |
|
:I am concerned with the number of user-pages in this category, which means that they will be deleted. In particular, because of another warning template ] was deleted taking useful warnings with it. ''] ]'', 13:40 ] ] (GMT). |
|
:I am concerned with the number of user-pages in this category, which means that they will be deleted. In particular, because of another warning template ] was deleted taking useful warnings with it. ''] ]'', 13:40 ] ] (GMT). |
|
|
|
|
== ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
Based on q quick glance at their contributions, I don't see any obvious reason to believe that ] is a sockpuppet of Jon Awbrey. It looks like Dmccreary made some minor edits to the Semiotic Triangle article which was later deleted as the original work was by an Awbrey sock. If you want to know more about the reasoning for the deletion I suggest you contact the admin who deleted it. Best, ] 12:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== unblock == |
|
|
|
|
|
{| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] |
|
|
| style="padding: 0.1em" | |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s): |
|
|
<br><br>Unwarranted |
|
|
|
|
|
''Request handled by:'' - ] ] 23:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) --> |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
: Any other day you would be consider vandal and desysopped. Don't mess with system pages that affect tons of users. -- <small>] <sup> ]]</sup><sub> ]]</sub></small> 23:24, 1 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Drini, see ] for discussion of blocks similar to this one. Do you really believe a block was necessary? Do you really have reason to believe Random832 would have continued if asked to stop? The block serves no preventative nature. - ] ] 23:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Move of "Betacommand and SVGs" thread == |
|
== Move of "Betacommand and SVGs" thread == |
Hi Random, I think you're a template/MediaWiki personage - how hard would it be to create a template that when invoked would insert/override a banner message when the web page was presented?
Specifically, along the lines of template:fool which would override the top message with "The date is April 1st <yyyy>" if the date was still Apr. 1, yyyy. I'm thinking about a graceful way out of pranking problems. Franamax (talk) 03:50, 6 April 2008 (UTC)