Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:04, 8 April 2008

Friendly tip: use edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. TableManners 03:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, I reverted your revert due to concerns over reliablity of the source. Please see WP:BLP and WP:RS. If you disagree, you may revert me, and I also encourage you to explain your disagreement on the articles talk page. TableManners 03:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did to Hal Turner, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Sceptre 19:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Hal Turner, Sean Hannity, blah blah

I'd appreciate it if you would stop fighting over the Hal Turner article while I straighten things out. Edit warring is a blockable violation of policy, so please don't break the three-revert rule. You already have, but I won't block you as I'm presuming you didn't know about it; just don't violate it again. Thanks, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 23:52, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You're right; it is important to mention the matter, because having the second largest talk show in the world's most powerful nation be a mouthpiece for a neo-Nazi is quite a noteworthy subject. I've sourced the page and added some clarifying bits; if you have anything else to add, feel free to do so.

Oh, and in the future, should anyone revert you for a reason you can't see, don't revert back; instead, contact them. If you don't receive a response, contact me. This way it'll be easy to resolve the conflict. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 01:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

You did well in not reverting Asher, keep it up. Now, I can't technically mediate because I'm involved in the matter, which could make me biased. However, speaking as an editor, I'm going to see if I can dig up enough material to create a "controversy" section or something of the sort in the Hannity article. Also, it may be worth mentioning it on the show's article, too. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :)} 22:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Bill O'Reilly

I did not violate the 3RR. My first edit was not a revert. Even if I had, you are inserting Original Research within a BLP issue, which is not a 3RR issue. 3RR covers content, not violation of WP Policies. Arzel (talk) 21:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Synthesis of Material is a form of Original Research, and your accusations against me on the request for editor assistance are not a good way to deal with conflict. False allegations will not serve you well. As I have had my differences with Blaxthos in the past, I still acknowledge when I have made mistakes, as he has done with me. Arzel (talk) 05:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Request for assistance

Regarding this request, I will offer what little advice I can. First off, Arzel did not violate WP:3RR, from what I can tell. I don't know if I buy his original research argument. I fail to see where there is any defamatory statements, so his WP:BLP assertion carries no weight. I am trying to wait and see what the rest of the community (of which you are a part) thinks. I advise that you make sure to avoid trolling or being disruptive. Also, I may not be the best person to ask for assistance. I have often stood up to Arzel's policy shopping, and I make no secret of my lack of good faith with regard to his arguments (ie I don't take his assertions as correct without verification). That being said, he's had valid points in the past, which I readily concede when I'm wrong. You should probably wait and see what consensus forms. Hope this helps. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

NPOV Warning

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Politics of Bill O'Reilly. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy, biography of living people and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. / Arnabdas (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Seriously, what is your problem? Have you read the policies regarding WP:BLP? Your continued additional of personal analysis regarding Bill O'Reilly is in violation of policies regarding WP:BLP, WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. You have been warned numerous times regarding this issues. Arzel (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't see any BLP and NPOV issues with your changes to the BOR article (at least today). I'd suggest that there may be other motivations for this notice, especially a differing point of view. Take it with a grain of salt -- the reputation of the two editors above doesn't lend much credibility to the warnings they sling. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 14:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)