Misplaced Pages

User talk:203.87.181.218: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:01, 9 April 2008 editBorgQueen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators106,936 editsm Protected User talk:203.87.181.218: abusing unblock template (expires 10:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC))← Previous edit Revision as of 14:29, 9 April 2008 edit undoYamla (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators147,985 edits Confirmed IP sock of blocked vandalNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{IPsock|Pinoybandwagon}}

== ] == == ] ==


Revision as of 14:29, 9 April 2008

Template:IPsock

User:Pinoybandwagon

User:Pinoybandwagon will retire 2 days from now because he will be having a vacation in Bataan. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 10:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Unblock me please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block should be expired a while ago, April 9 10:22 am. Since the time today is 3:30 pm.

Decline reason:

see below. -- lucasbfr 07:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:26, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

As this IP has apparently been used for sockpuppetry (leading to multiple account blocks), I've blocked all editing from this IP for one week. – Luna Santin (talk) 07:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh, fuck! I wanted to be unblocked right now! 203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.87.181.218 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for a long time already.

Decline reason:

You are blocked due to abusing multiple accounts, I don't think unblocking you will do any good at this stage. -- lucasbfr 07:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Unblocking me will do any good at this stage. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:52, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

203.87.181.218 (talk) 07:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This time

I should be unblocked by TODAY or TOMORROW because UNBLOCKING WILL REALLY DO GOOD TO ME AT THIS STAGE. 203.87.181.218 (talk) 08:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)