| Revision as of 16:39, 7 August 2005 editRusty2005 (talk | contribs)1,474 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:39, 7 August 2005 edit undoRusty2005 (talk | contribs)1,474 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| ==Diplomacy== | ==Diplomacy== | ||
| You really need to be more diplomatic. On the Fatherland talkpage, you refer to the article's original author (i.e: me) as a "troll". I've been reading your comments on other talk pages, and based on those, I do not believe you have the right to criticise my work on here. It is not only impolite and arrogant to brazenly insult people older and wiser than yourself, but it is also a very risky path to take if you wish to become an Administrator. I agree entirely with Linuxbeak's above comments, and seeing as he is an Administrator with the power to block you, I would seriously advise you to think carefully about what you write in future. | You really need to be more diplomatic. On the Fatherland talkpage, you refer to the article's original author (i.e: me) as a "troll". I've been reading your comments on other talk pages, and based on those, I do not believe you have the right to criticise my work on here. It is not only impolite and arrogant to brazenly insult people older and wiser than yourself, but it is also a very risky path to take if you wish to become an Administrator. I agree entirely with Linuxbeak's above comments, and seeing as he is an Administrator with the power to block you, I would seriously advise you to think carefully about what you write in future. ] 16:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 7 August 2005
Rainbowwarrior1977 (talk · contribs · block log)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
Your Accusations
In responce to the comments on my talk page: My message made no legal threat. I am sorry that you misinterpreted it. Warning someone that they might be breaking the law is not a threat. I never said that either Misplaced Pages or I would take any legal action against you; I only warned you for your benefit that many localities don't like behavior similar yours and it would be best to change your ways. Furthermore, you have clearly and willfully violated just about every bit of Misplaced Pages policy that there is to violate including personal attacks against me, so no administrator would take you seriously if you accused me (or anyone else) of a policy violation. -Casito⇝Talk 06:25, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Do not list another user's page for deletion
If you persist in marking Casito's page for deletion, you will be banned. Do not modify or remove this warning - I will monitor your behaviour and will remove it myself when I see fit. Manning 05:32, July 22, 2005 (UTC) (Administrator).
Thanks
Thanks for your words of encouragement - and for your work here! -- BDAbramson 19:48, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
WP:RFA Warning
Please do not delist any pages from the WP:RFA page. I understand there is a dispute between you and other editors on that page, but that doesn't give you the right to remove a valid RFA out of spite. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:09, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
No, it means you're too new and have demonstrated you do not have a solid grasp on Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. And, "my boy", I happen to have said authority you doubt I have. And, seeing you just relisted the RFA... again... I am going to extend said authority by blocking you for 30 minutes. Take this time to read Misplaced Pages:Disruption and Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith before you make a serious blunder. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:19, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Following the rules
I suspect you know the rules already, so I'll just give you one last warning. You should not use the speedy delete template to request verification of facts. You could simply have googled Mark Bortz's name yourself.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BortMa00.htm
If you will comply with policy, however, you are welcome to keep editing here. Uncle Ed 19:00, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
Diplomacy
You really need to be more diplomatic. On the Fatherland talkpage, you refer to the article's original author (i.e: me) as a "troll". I've been reading your comments on other talk pages, and based on those, I do not believe you have the right to criticise my work on here. It is not only impolite and arrogant to brazenly insult people older and wiser than yourself, but it is also a very risky path to take if you wish to become an Administrator. I agree entirely with Linuxbeak's above comments, and seeing as he is an Administrator with the power to block you, I would seriously advise you to think carefully about what you write in future. Rusty2005 16:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC)