Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Rainbowwarrior1977: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:15, 7 August 2005 editEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits Fixing transcluded text← Previous edit Revision as of 23:28, 7 August 2005 edit undoEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits Filled inNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


==Statement of the dispute== ==Statement of the dispute==
''This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''


=== Description === === Description ===
{{user|Rainbowwarrior1977}} has engaged in a series of disruptive behavior on Misplaced Pages. He has:
''{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}''
*Engaged in personal attacks against other users
*Engaged in RfA fraud
*Engaged in article vandalism
*Engaged in userpage vandalism
*Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
*Engaged in sockpuppetry
*Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
*Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
*Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims

This user appears to be a sockpuppet of {{vandal|Musachachado}}. He confirms this himself . A large number of his edits are for the purpose of harassing/attacking other users or otherwise disrupting Misplaced Pages.


=== Evidence of disputed behavior === === Evidence of disputed behavior ===
(provide diffs and links) (provide diffs and links)
#Engaged in personal attacks against other users:
:#
#*
:#
#*
#* (Re: Linuxbeak removing his RfA as fraud.)
#*
#*
#*
#*
#*
#Engaged in RfA fraud
#* reveals his repeated re-insertion of his RfA after several admins removed it as improper.
#* revals his efforts to disrupt RfA and use his entry to attack others.
#* suggests a less-than-honorable intent for seeking adminship.
#*] Nominated Purplefeltangel for adminship without her consent. The nomination was subsequently closed early at her request.
#*
#Engaged in article vandalism
#* of ].
#*] (the chair of the RNC). There appears to be speculation about Mehlman's sexuality, but the tag is inappropriate nonetheless.]
#*
#*
#Engaged in userpage vandalism
#* added to ]
#* to ].
#* added to ]
#* from ]
#* from ]
#Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
#* added to ]
#* added to ]
#* added to ]
#Engaged in sockpuppetry
#*
#* show that {{vandal|SamuraiBoywithaDrugProblem}} is his sockpuppet.
#*{{vandal|Pamstar}} nominated him for VfD; claims to be his wife. ] shows her involvement at Sasquatch's RfA and that nominating Rainbowwarrior1977 was her tenth edit. ] shows the same pattern as Rainbowwarrior1977's: born in South America, grew up in Florida.
#Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
#*
#*
#*
#* His first edit, by the way.
#Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
#*
#*
#*
#*
#* (Responding to ] suggestion that the VfD tag should be removed from ].)
#Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims
#*
#*
#*
#*Claims ]
#*
#*
#*
#*


=== Applicable policies === === Applicable policies ===
{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct} {list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}
#]
:#
#]
:#
#]
#] For evading a block with a sockpuppet.
#]
#]
#]


=== Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute === === Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute ===
(provide diffs and links) (provide diffs and links)
#]
:#
#]
:#
#]
#]
#]
#]
#]
#]
#]
#Numerous editors commented ]


=== Users certifying the basis for this dispute === === Users certifying the basis for this dispute ===
<!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. Please notify the user, via his talk page, that a conduct dispute has been raised. --> <!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. Please notify the user, via his talk page, that a conduct dispute has been raised. -->
(sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) (sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)
#] · ] 23:28, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
:#
:# #


=== Other users who endorse this summary === === Other users who endorse this summary ===
<!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. --> <!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. -->
(sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) (sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)
:# #
:# #


==Response== ==Response==

Revision as of 23:28, 7 August 2005

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 20:11, August 7, 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 11:24, 10 January 2025 (UTC).

Statement of the dispute

Description

Rainbowwarrior1977 (talk · contribs) has engaged in a series of disruptive behavior on Misplaced Pages. He has:

  • Engaged in personal attacks against other users
  • Engaged in RfA fraud
  • Engaged in article vandalism
  • Engaged in userpage vandalism
  • Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
  • Engaged in sockpuppetry
  • Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
  • Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
  • Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims

This user appears to be a sockpuppet of Musachachado (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He confirms this himself in this edit. A large number of his edits are for the purpose of harassing/attacking other users or otherwise disrupting Misplaced Pages.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Engaged in personal attacks against other users:
  2. Engaged in RfA fraud
  3. Engaged in article vandalism
  4. Engaged in userpage vandalism
  5. Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
  6. Engaged in sockpuppetry
  7. Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
  8. Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
  9. Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims

Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. WP:NPA
  2. WP:Vandalism
  3. WP:SOCK
  4. WP:BLOCK For evading a block with a sockpuppet.
  5. WP:CIVIL
  6. WP:RFA
  7. WP:POINT

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Casito attempts to resolve the "legal threats" dispute
  2. Manning Bartlett warns about CSD violations. Twice.
  3. Linuxbeak warns about RfA. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Rainbowwarrior1977&diff=20421991&oldid=20421434 And blocks for 30 mins.
  4. Uncle Ed warns about CSD abuse.
  5. Rusty2005 warns about civility.
  6. Soltak warns about deception. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Rainbowwarrior1977&diff=20491255&oldid=20490172 Twice. And adds a note about NPA and civility.
  7. I raised the alarm on AN/I.
  8. Ryan tries to reason with him.
  9. Zscout370 also tries reasoning.
  10. Numerous editors commented at the RfA.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

  1. Essjay · Talk 23:28, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.