| Revision as of 01:53, 14 April 2008 editAMK152 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,877 edits →Comeback?: sp fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:33, 14 April 2008 edit undoAMK152 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,877 edits →Peer Review: updateNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ==Peer Review== | ==Peer Review== | ||
| <onlyinclude>{{#ifeq:{{{name}}}|SpongeBob SquarePants|<font color="blue">]<sup>(] • ] • ) </sup></font> 02:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)}}</onlyinclude>The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic ], and might not be applicable for the article in question. | |||
| <!--Please do not archive this at any given time--> | |||
| *Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at ]. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on ], and should adequately summarize the article.<sup>]]</sup> | |||
| The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic ], and might not be applicable for the article in question. | |||
| *Per ] and ], months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide ] for the article.<sup>]]</sup> | *Per ] and ], months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide ] for the article.<sup>]]</sup> | ||
| *Per ] and ], years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as ], ].<sup>]]</sup> | *Per ] and ], years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as ], ].<sup>]]</sup> | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| **''is considered'' | **''is considered'' | ||
| **might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper ] (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please <strike>strike</strike> this comment).<sup>]]</sup> <!--This javascript cannot determine if a citation is provided; if all weasel terms are covered by citations, please strike this--> | **might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper ] (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please <strike>strike</strike> this comment).<sup>]]</sup> <!--This javascript cannot determine if a citation is provided; if all weasel terms are covered by citations, please strike this--> | ||
| *The script has spotted the following contractions: ''hasn't, won't'', if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded. | |||
| *As done in ], footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the ], but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, ''the sun is larger than the moon .'' is usually written as ''the sun is larger than the moon.''<sup>]]</sup> | |||
| *Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> | *Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of ]. See also ].<sup>]]</sup> | ||
| You may wish to browse through ] for further ideas. Thanks, <font color="blue">]<sup>(] • ] • ) </sup></font> |
You may wish to browse through ] for further ideas. Thanks, <font color="blue">]<sup>(] • ] • ) </sup></font> 02:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Comeback? == | == Comeback? == | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 14 April 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SpongeBob SquarePants article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Template:WikiProjectSpongeBobSquarePants
Template:Wikiproject NickelodeonPlease add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | SpongeBob SquarePants received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk. |
Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants/Archives
Due to errors in page moving the edit history for this page prior to March 26, 2006 is at .
Peer Review
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
- Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.
- There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
- is considered
- might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please
strikethis comment).
- The script has spotted the following contractions: hasn't, won't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152 02:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Comeback?
I'm terribly sorry, but I'm being dead serious. Could we put a title such as "Comeback and Decline". I mean we all know it. It just isn't the same anymore. I, personally, feel that in the beginning the creators knew how to draw well, they just chose a style that was well-liked, but lately (in their "comeback") it's just...different. It's colored differently, it's not that funny anymore, it's oddly predictable, the detail is disappointingly overwhelming, the voices are strange, and its focus went from regular humor to more of a crude humor (unfortunately, because I feel ashamed when I watch something with crude humor). Just a suggestion. 24.3.239.76 (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
That's what we call an opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.88.69 (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- 71.10.88.69 is right. You may think about it as one way while others don't. If the ratings dropped at a certain time and can be proven, then yes, that is a decline, but only due to the ratings unless additional details can be sourced. -AMK152 01:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
No mention of Pest of the West?
It isn't mentioned anywhere. Kimera Kat (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- B-Class television articles
- High-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- B-Class Animation articles
- Unknown-importance Animation articles
- B-Class Animation articles of Unknown-importance
- B-Class American animation articles
- Top-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Old requests for peer review