Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:22, 14 April 2008

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Template:WikiProjectSpongeBobSquarePants Template:Wikiproject NickelodeonPlease add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Television High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Animation: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Top-importance).

Template:Releaseversion

SpongeBob SquarePants received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about rants, reviews, or any other forum like topics at the Reference desk.

Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants/Archives

Due to errors in page moving the edit history for this page prior to March 26, 2006 is at .

Peer Review

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
• Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
• Per Misplaced Pages:Context and Misplaced Pages:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.
• There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • is considered
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).
• The script has spotted the following contractions: hasn't, won't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Misplaced Pages's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AMK152 02:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Comeback?

I'm terribly sorry, but I'm being dead serious. Could we put a title such as "Comeback and Decline". I mean we all know it. It just isn't the same anymore. I, personally, feel that in the beginning the creators knew how to draw well, they just chose a style that was well-liked, but lately (in their "comeback") it's just...different. It's colored differently, it's not that funny anymore, it's oddly predictable, the detail is disappointingly overwhelming, the voices are strange, and its focus went from regular humor to more of a crude humor (unfortunately, because I feel ashamed when I watch something with crude humor). Just a suggestion. 24.3.239.76 (talk) 00:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

That's what we call an opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.10.88.69 (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

71.10.88.69 is right. You may think about it as one way while others don't. If the ratings dropped at a certain time and can be proven, then yes, that is a decline, but only due to the ratings unless additional details can be sourced. -AMK152 01:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

You have completely missed the point. We DO all know Spongebob SquarePants has gotten worse. That's putting it kindly.

You guys seem to just be denying it so you wouldn't be in violation of wikipedia's POV rules. Don't Be afraid, AMK152 to state your own opinion and don't incourage others to be afraid either.

What was stated may have been an opinion, but if you look around more and do your research you will find just how "inaccurate" 24.3.239.76 really is. The only thing I would ask them to change about their "single" opinion is that 24.3.239.76 said the new episodes ended predictably when in fact they try to take every IMpossible twist and turn to make themselves funny which usually ends up blowing up in the faces of both the story writers and the once joyful but now-hapless viewers.

That too was also an opinion. But don't let that stray you off topic. What matters is something absolutely MUST be said/typed. I kind of more straight-forward fried the new show's direction's ass as you see above, but in the actual summary get-down on the article of Spongebob SquarePants, someone could be more...abiding and not so POV-ish.

There ARE articles out there by famous credible TV critics addressing this shows new design negetively. Just look for them. You could even look on Amazon. The Season 5 boxset is what got the worst reviews so just pick something off of there. If there is anyone who disagrees with the wiki-politically correct article, the let them raise the matter. Otherwise, we should all best start considering the idea before this grows violent.ThegreatWakkorati (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

No mention of Pest of the West?

It isn't mentioned anywhere. Kimera Kat (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• B-Class television articles
• High-importance television articles
• WikiProject Television articles
• B-Class Animation articles
• Unknown-importance Animation articles
• B-Class Animation articles of Unknown-importance
• B-Class American animation articles
• Top-importance American animation articles
• American animation work group articles
• WikiProject Animation articles
• Old requests for peer review