| Revision as of 23:49, 17 April 2008 editCheeser1 (talk | contribs)7,317 editsm RVV← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:46, 18 April 2008 edit undoPeaceNT (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers14,537 edits →re:CSD G4: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| <!--And to all the morons at Misplaced Pages "Review" spending their time over-analysing every single thing everyone does: get a life. If you think Misplaced Pages is such a sad waste of time, and that people who contribute here are so stupid, why spend your time obsessing over every detail of what even we would not consider worth all that effort? Losers.--> | <!--And to all the morons at Misplaced Pages "Review" spending their time over-analysing every single thing everyone does: get a life. If you think Misplaced Pages is such a sad waste of time, and that people who contribute here are so stupid, why spend your time obsessing over every detail of what even we would not consider worth all that effort? Losers.--> | ||
| == re:CSD G4 == | |||
| Hi, Cheeser. Thanks for the message, I often declined deletion proposals similar to yours when no advance notice had been given to the editor reminding them about their subpage. (once in a while, it could be a good-faith editor forgetting about their subpage – just giving them the benefit of doubt, so to speak ;)) I got the page in question automatically watchlisted after editing it, thus I was going to monitor the situation and see it any further edits would be made there after that user received your message. Granted, I didn't properly check the timestamp to realize the page had stayed unedited for several months, and User:QueenAdelaide appears rather too inactive to respond to any notification. That was certainly an oversight on my part; lucky me user Barneca helped fix the matter with his delete button. | |||
| About CSD G4, CSD is one of the few wiki policies that i suppose i can carry in my head; my practice/interpretation of it isn't perfect, but please rest assured that I do keep myself up-to-date with these deletion polices when patrolling CSD area. I just hope I didn't infuriate you too much by removing the tag without proper explanation on your talk; i know it could be really annoying when one sees an admin who seems incompetent declining their speedy deletion proposal. Again, you were correct on the nose, my apologies. Please keep up your work, it is very much appreciated. Happy editing, --] (]) 13:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:46, 18 April 2008
Scapegoat
This page is a soft redirect.
re:CSD G4
Hi, Cheeser. Thanks for the message, I often declined deletion proposals similar to yours when no advance notice had been given to the editor reminding them about their subpage. (once in a while, it could be a good-faith editor forgetting about their subpage – just giving them the benefit of doubt, so to speak ;)) I got the page in question automatically watchlisted after editing it, thus I was going to monitor the situation and see it any further edits would be made there after that user received your message. Granted, I didn't properly check the timestamp to realize the page had stayed unedited for several months, and User:QueenAdelaide appears rather too inactive to respond to any notification. That was certainly an oversight on my part; lucky me user Barneca helped fix the matter with his delete button.
About CSD G4, CSD is one of the few wiki policies that i suppose i can carry in my head; my practice/interpretation of it isn't perfect, but please rest assured that I do keep myself up-to-date with these deletion polices when patrolling CSD area. I just hope I didn't infuriate you too much by removing the tag without proper explanation on your talk; i know it could be really annoying when one sees an admin who seems incompetent declining their speedy deletion proposal. Again, you were correct on the nose, my apologies. Please keep up your work, it is very much appreciated. Happy editing, --PeaceNT (talk) 13:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Category: