| Revision as of 09:11, 19 April 2008 editSomeone another (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers8,953 edits →Mungyodance: Delete.← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:53, 19 April 2008 edit undoStifle (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators84,023 edits deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Only citation leads to a message board log-in, lacks the multiple in-depth ] needed to demonstrate ]. A search is turning up nothing. ]] 09:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Only citation leads to a message board log-in, lacks the multiple in-depth ] needed to demonstrate ]. A search is turning up nothing. ]] 09:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' unless ] from ] are added to comply with the ]. ] (]) 15:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:53, 19 April 2008
Mungyodance
- Mungyodance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Would being a slightly-well-known Stepmania-based game inherit its notability? Sorry, its worth a mention on the Stepmania page as how far you can go when you mess with StepMania, but sorry guys, I'll let you decide its fate. ViperSnake151 21:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
So the reason why the entry should be deleted is .. ? Magi 08:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.165.166.21 (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. —BelovedFreak 21:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- It does not cite reliable published sources, thus it doesn't assert notability, which is grounds for deletion. ViperSnake151 18:38, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Just to confirm: Did you research the subject, or act entirely on the basis of the article's current state? --Kizor 01:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 22:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
The game would certianly be the most notable of the Stepmania based freeware games. However, is a freeware game of this level truly notable for Misplaced Pages? I would honestly say yes, if only at the bare minimum, but I can see why this would be up for deletion. Is this truely any different, however, from In The Groove? In many ways, no: It simply is designed to be freely available, adverse to ITG, which was designed as a commercial product. Also, as a developer of a similar freeware stepmania based project, I know the effort it takes for a person to actually create something original based on it: This being the best example in the non commercial sector: and for that it is notable enough. Nothing else may rank, but I think this does, if ONLY by a tiny ammount. KurisuYamato (talk) 05:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Not one single reference or proof of notability. — flamingspinach | (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't Delete. The upcoming third game was featured on the Bemanistyle, quite literally the largest Rhythm/Dance/Music game site in the world. --ToyoWolf (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Don't Delete This is an excellent example of a free, yet commercial quality game coming from a high-quality, up-and-coming independent record label, and is also from a well-known "furry" DJ. Just my two cents. ~Ark =^-^= (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Also, article tagged for Rescue. May also add sites and references.
- Delete Only citation leads to a message board log-in, lacks the multiple in-depth reliable sources needed to demonstrate notability. A search is turning up nothing. Someoneanother 09:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2008 (UTC)