| Revision as of 21:47, 14 April 2008 editTastyPoutine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,289 edits wd← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:59, 19 April 2008 edit undoSheffieldSteel (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,979 editsm tag unsignedNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> -- <font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> -- <font face="Futura">] <sup>(] • ])</sup> </font> 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak Delete''' for now. I am not entirely certain how to judge a think-tank organization. Right now I am focusing on how many notable individuals may be a part in combination with how often their research work is cited by mainstream publications, rather than ] or the Cato Institute, which are generally sympathetic and probably have an interest in pimping this organization. Just on my search, I didn't really find anything and none of the refs offer anything in this regard, just their own website, plus Greg Mankiw and Cato sites. | *'''Weak Delete''' for now. I am not entirely certain how to judge a think-tank organization. Right now I am focusing on how many notable individuals may be a part in combination with how often their research work is cited by mainstream publications, rather than ] or the Cato Institute, which are generally sympathetic and probably have an interest in pimping this organization. Just on my search, I didn't really find anything and none of the refs offer anything in this regard, just their own website, plus Greg Mankiw and Cato sites. {{unsigned|Montco}} | ||
Revision as of 19:59, 19 April 2008
Prometheus Institute
- Prometheus Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is about a non-notable organization and was created by editors affiliated with the group. This organization, based in Southern California, should not be confused with the more prominent organization of the same name in Boston. The article has multiple references and external links but when you actually visit them, you find they are inadequate to establish notability. See also: Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Spam#User:Tang23 (permanent link)
A. B. 22:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Related articles proposed for deletion: Rand Getlin and Justin Hartfield --A. B. 22:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- A. B. 22:45, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Delete for now. I am not entirely certain how to judge a think-tank organization. Right now I am focusing on how many notable individuals may be a part in combination with how often their research work is cited by mainstream publications, rather than Reason Magazine or the Cato Institute, which are generally sympathetic and probably have an interest in pimping this organization. Just on my search, I didn't really find anything and none of the refs offer anything in this regard, just their own website, plus Greg Mankiw and Cato sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Montco (talk • contribs)