| Revision as of 04:48, 22 April 2008 editMARussellPESE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,241 editsm Give me a break.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:54, 22 April 2008 edit undoMARussellPESE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,241 editsm →Give me a breakNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==Give me a break== | ==Give me a break== | ||
| You delete two fair warnings for personal attacks that include specific statements, reply on my talk page with a bogus "Warning" that's a repetition of material on your own, and then tell me ''I'm not'' to remove material from my talk page? Can you see the hypocrisy? | You delete two fair warnings for personal attacks that include specific statements, reply on my talk page with a bogus "Warning" that's a repetition of material on your own, and then tell me ''I'm not'' to remove material from my talk page, when the ] say I can? Can you see the hypocrisy? I see the ]. | ||
| What you read as sarcasm is criticism of your arguments, or lack thereof. Proof by assertion is a fallacy, but unfortunately a method you favor. You can't call that what it is without calling it what it is. What you don't consider personal attacks are your statements and accusations about me or other editors. Can you see the hypocrisy? | What you read as sarcasm is criticism of your arguments, or lack thereof. Proof by assertion is a fallacy, but unfortunately a method you favor. You can't call that what it is without calling it what it is. What you don't consider personal attacks are your statements and accusations about me or other editors. Can you see the hypocrisy? | ||
Revision as of 04:54, 22 April 2008
Please post comments about on-going discussions, edits, and/or content to the article's discussion page. I don't believe they can be of any benefit to anyone being closed off to this page.
I archive "discussion oriented" comments, along with all other resolved issues.
Give me a break
You delete two fair warnings for personal attacks that include specific statements, reply on my talk page with a bogus "Warning" that's a repetition of material on your own, and then tell me I'm not to remove material from my talk page, when the talk page guidelines say I can? Can you see the hypocrisy? I see the harassment.
What you read as sarcasm is criticism of your arguments, or lack thereof. Proof by assertion is a fallacy, but unfortunately a method you favor. You can't call that what it is without calling it what it is. What you don't consider personal attacks are your statements and accusations about me or other editors. Can you see the hypocrisy?
If your arguments were more sound, and if you could keep your comments about your interlocutors to yourself, you'd be much more effective. MARussellPESE (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)