| Revision as of 14:42, 23 April 2008 editRodhullandemu (talk | contribs)115,150 edits →User talk:212.219.115.245: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:50, 23 April 2008 edit undoRjd0060 (talk | contribs)33,499 edits →User talk:212.219.115.245: +comNext edit → | ||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Hi |
Hi Ryan, hasn't vandalised after my previous warning; do you think a block is right here? --''']''' (]) 14:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :I've refactored your comment, only to spell my name right ;-) . I've replied on your talk page. - ] (]) 14:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:50, 23 April 2008
I will usually reply to messages left here on your talk page.
 Archives |
|
Archive 4 • Archive 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 9 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Afghan Historian
Hey, Actually I only briefly came back to correct some absurd references in a "Middle East" article about Pakistan. I wasn't intending on coming back for good. That won't happen until real free time comes back again, lol. I finished my corrections and am leaving again. If it could be protected again, that would be great. Thanks! Afghan Historian (talk) 12:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Well I stopped editing since last night so consider my role on wikipedia over for now. I promise you will not see me again on wikipedia so I would still like my page to be protected and retired again, if that is still possible. ;) Afghan Historian (talk) 20:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
Hagger
I noticed that you have been deleting articles with this title. According to what I have seen the user creating these articles is likely a sockpuppet of the banned user User:Grawp. See Special:Contributions/Grawp for more details. Vivio Testarossa 05:45, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
chandu v. the bad bot
Chandu thanks you for reverting the mistagging. Image:ChanduTheMagician.jpg. EraserGirl (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Can you explain something small? Your comment on the Incidents page "Actually, the image isn't being used, as evident from the empty "File links" section on the Image description page. " Confuses me. as the image has always been linked to the article and vice versa. I didn't fix the link and it doesn't appear that you did, so how was it ever empty? EraserGirl (talk) 04:00, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well then you are in error, the image has been displayed ON the page since it was added, not just linked but actually appeared in the infobox. I can see if the image size was incorrect there might be a problem but it didn't prevent the image from actually being seen and yes the file link was actually THERE when I checked all the info on the image page after the bot tagged it. Perhaps you are confused. No matter it is all fixed now. Thanks again for fixing the tag. EraserGirl (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
For reverting the vandalism on my talk page, have a cookie
// Finns has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
// Finns 18:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
WP:Lectures
Today (Apr 20th), around 15:00 UTC! Possibly on Skype, but certainly on IRC (#wikipedia-en-lectures on freenode)! I don't actually know about the Skype details... Message me on Skype (xavexgoem) about that, if you have it (no harm in getting it, either), and then maybe by that time I'll have a clue :-p Xavexgoem (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
User talk:212.219.115.245
Hi Ryan, hasn't vandalised after my previous warning; do you think a block is right here? --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've refactored your comment, only to spell my name right ;-) . I've replied on your talk page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)