Misplaced Pages

Talk:Angelo Errichetti: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:53, 24 April 2008 editDavid in DC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,601 editsm This Guy Fits American Criminal Category: copy-edit← Previous edit Revision as of 22:28, 24 April 2008 edit undoJkp212 (talk | contribs)769 edits This Guy Fits American Criminal Category: it's still UNDUE WEIGHTNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
: The cat and mention of crime should be taken out until the article is expanded. Right now, it's 50% of the article, a clear case of undue weight. --] (]) 19:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC) : The cat and mention of crime should be taken out until the article is expanded. Right now, it's 50% of the article, a clear case of undue weight. --] (]) 19:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
::No. Respectfully, he's notable for being a politician on the take. That's an occupational criminal. The article can be expanded to deal with the WEIGHT issue. Heed the English philosopers Lennon and McCartney for the moment. ]. ] (]) 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC) ::No. Respectfully, he's notable for being a politician on the take. That's an occupational criminal. The article can be expanded to deal with the WEIGHT issue. Heed the English philosopers Lennon and McCartney for the moment. ]. ] (]) 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
:::: I'm fine leaving it, but my point is that as it stands now it's suffering from undue weight. My personal feeling is that we shouldn't have a hugely weighted negative BLP. If another editor expands the piece then it makes more sense (to me) to have the other info you mention. --] (]) 22:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:28, 24 April 2008

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Democrat or Republican?

Which is it? Why does this article omit that? --69.37.84.35 15:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

This Guy Fits American Criminal Category

Twain said the only distinctly criminal class we have in America are the members of Congress. More seriously, if the guy is taking big bucks on the side --- by working in the state legislature for the side-guys giving him the big bucks --- and he's convicted of it, I'm prepared to concede that he was a criminal by occupation. That's what the cat requires. David in DC (talk) 20:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

The cat and mention of crime should be taken out until the article is expanded. Right now, it's 50% of the article, a clear case of undue weight. --Jkp212 (talk) 19:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
No. Respectfully, he's notable for being a politician on the take. That's an occupational criminal. The article can be expanded to deal with the WEIGHT issue. Heed the English philosopers Lennon and McCartney for the moment. Let it be. David in DC (talk) 20:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm fine leaving it, but my point is that as it stands now it's suffering from undue weight. My personal feeling is that we shouldn't have a hugely weighted negative BLP. If another editor expands the piece then it makes more sense (to me) to have the other info you mention. --Jkp212 (talk) 22:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: