| Revision as of 14:31, 23 July 2005 editPullUpYourSocks (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,847 editsm {{statute-stub}} and Category:1767 in law← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:38, 13 August 2005 edit undo68.39.174.91 (talk) Moved that to a more appropriate placeNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| The '''Townshend Acts''' were passed in ] by the ], having been proposed by ] as ] just before his death. These laws placed a ] on common products, such as ], ], ], ], and ]. In contrast to the ], the laws were not a direct tax but a tax on imports. There was opposition to this in the British colonies of ], using the slogan "''no taxation without representation''" spoken by ]. | The '''Townshend Acts''' were passed in ] by the ], having been proposed by ] as ] just before his death. These laws placed a ] on common products, such as ], ], ], ], and ]. In contrast to the ], the laws were not a direct tax but a tax on imports. There was opposition to this in the British colonies of ], using the slogan "''no taxation without representation''" spoken by ]. | ||
| ⚫ | The Townshend acts also created three new admirality courts to try Americans who ignored the law. The acts led to outrage among the colonists and may have helped spark the ''Liberty'' seizure and riots of 1768. | ||
| ]s avoided the taxes by importing goods without the taxes and by organizing a ] of the legitimate imports. ] of Boston was a notable supporter of the boycott. To protect the ]'s trade, the three-penny tax on tea was removed in the ], and the adverse economic consequences for the smugglers led to the ]. | ]s avoided the taxes by importing goods without the taxes and by organizing a ] of the legitimate imports. ] of Boston was a notable supporter of the boycott. To protect the ]'s trade, the three-penny tax on tea was removed in the ], and the adverse economic consequences for the smugglers led to the ]. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
| {{statute-stub}} | {{statute-stub}} | ||
| {{UK-hist-stub}} | {{UK-hist-stub}} | ||
| ⚫ | The Townshend acts also created three new admirality courts to try Americans who ignored the law. The acts led to outrage among the colonists and may have helped spark the ''Liberty'' seizure and riots of 1768. | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Revision as of 07:38, 13 August 2005
The Townshend Acts were passed in 1767 by the British Parliament, having been proposed by Charles Townshend as Chancellor of the Exchequer just before his death. These laws placed a tax on common products, such as lead, paper, paint, glass, and tea. In contrast to the Stamp Act, the laws were not a direct tax but a tax on imports. There was opposition to this in the British colonies of North America, using the slogan "no taxation without representation" spoken by James Otis.
The Townshend acts also created three new admirality courts to try Americans who ignored the law. The acts led to outrage among the colonists and may have helped spark the Liberty seizure and riots of 1768.
Smugglers avoided the taxes by importing goods without the taxes and by organizing a boycott of the legitimate imports. Samuel Adams of Boston was a notable supporter of the boycott. To protect the British East India Company's trade, the three-penny tax on tea was removed in the Tea Act, and the adverse economic consequences for the smugglers led to the Boston Tea Party.
Eventually, John Dickinson raised support to repeal the Townshend Acts by a series of 12 letters addressing himself as "The Farmer."
External links
- The Townshend Act: text.
  | This article relating to the history of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
 | This legislation article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
 | This article related to the history of the United Kingdom or its predecessor states is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |