Revision as of 00:22, 2 May 2008 editPoliticianTexas (talk | contribs)650 edits →Welcome← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:36, 2 May 2008 edit undoThomasalazar (talk | contribs)1,378 edits →Request for Bureaucrat Nomination: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
To begin, one doesn't need to be an admin to edit the articles of others and to place tags. Since ] the articles you create (no one else owns theirs either), everyone is free to comment on and edit the work of others. I'm not familiar with the article in question, so I won't comment on that. As far as userboxes go, well you do have a lot. However, that's up to you, and I don't have a problem with it. (Although it's probably worth noting that contentious userboxes, such as those that advocate disruptive positions, can be removed). Best, --] <sup>(])</sup> 01:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | To begin, one doesn't need to be an admin to edit the articles of others and to place tags. Since ] the articles you create (no one else owns theirs either), everyone is free to comment on and edit the work of others. I'm not familiar with the article in question, so I won't comment on that. As far as userboxes go, well you do have a lot. However, that's up to you, and I don't have a problem with it. (Although it's probably worth noting that contentious userboxes, such as those that advocate disruptive positions, can be removed). Best, --] <sup>(])</sup> 01:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Request for Bureaucrat Nomination == | |||
Yes you can use my name on it! | |||
I really cant stand ] | |||
He is just causing more damage to articles its really unprofessional. | |||
Something needs to be done, Quick! | |||
<font color=#003300></font> ] <sub>]</sub> 9:36 MT, 1 May 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:36, 2 May 2008
Hi. Please don't remove cleanup notices without actually doing any cleanup. They're placed there to alert others that the article needs attention. Also, you really shouldn't blank your talk page either. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again. First of all, unless you're leaving the project, you can't blank this page. Second, please don't remove cleanup notices without doing any cleaning up. Third, this is supposed to be a community effort. It would be appreciated if you were to interact with other users. Thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
For your benefit, I've requested assistance for you here: . This isn't an attempt to get you in trouble but rather an attempt to help you to understand the working of this site better. Please feel free to respond on my talk page and please feel free to ask me for help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Both of you, be aware; the above is incorrect. While it makes everyone's life easier if you archive posts, you are explicitly permitted to remove anything you like from your talk page. — iridescent 00:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Note at WQA
To begin, one doesn't need to be an admin to edit the articles of others and to place tags. Since you don't own the articles you create (no one else owns theirs either), everyone is free to comment on and edit the work of others. I'm not familiar with the article in question, so I won't comment on that. As far as userboxes go, well you do have a lot. However, that's up to you, and I don't have a problem with it. (Although it's probably worth noting that contentious userboxes, such as those that advocate disruptive positions, can be removed). Best, --Bfigura 01:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Request for Bureaucrat Nomination
Yes you can use my name on it! I really cant stand user:discospinster He is just causing more damage to articles its really unprofessional. Something needs to be done, Quick!
TomSalazar Chat?! 9:36 MT, 1 May 2008 (UTC)