Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:51, 16 May 2008

Home	Talk	About me	Awards	Articles	eMail	Contributions	Images	Notebook	Sandbox	Todo	Toolbox

Archives

15 Nov 2005 – 28 Feb 2006 01 Mar 2006 – 30 Jun 2006 01 Jul 2006 – 30 Sep 2006 01 Oct 2006 – 31 Dec 2006 01 Jan 2007 – 31 Mar 2007 01 Apr 2007 – 30 Jun 2007 01 Jul 2007 – 30 Sep 2007 01 Oct 2007 – 31 Dec 2007 01 Jan 2008 – 31 Mar 2008 01 Apr 2008 – ...

No problem

No worries. I removed the post and wanted to make sure I did the courtesy of leaving a polite explanation for you, offering a couple of options to discuss the issue further if needed. My email box is open and I'm on IRC sporadically if you needed to touch base about it. Cheers! Vassyana (talk) 02:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Tks. It was what I hope was a momentary lapse on my part. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes we just have to be careful.--Filll (talk) 02:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for assistance re sockpuppet case

Hi, I was referred to you by User_talk:Shalom, who recently marked as resolved a sockpuppet case without really resolving it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Garhauer_%282nd%29

I would appreciate it if you might look over that, together with the discussion between myself and Shalom on his talk page.

Or else you could "unresolve" the sock puppet case, which sat in the queue for several weeks without attention as it is.

Thanks.

bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 06:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Looks like he closed it. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

What? He is not an admin. He just closed the case without taking any action whatsoever. Four sockpuppets, a repeat offender, and about the clearest case I can imagine...?

Forgive me, I'm annoyed cos I waste an hour doing the report then this happens. bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 11:02, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Experienced and trusted users are allowed to close obvious cases. Shalom is very good at SSP, I ask him for input a lot there. He actions are well within standard actions for SSPs of this nature. Leaving one account active is not unusual at all. If problems with the sock/master persist, you can let me know directly on my talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

He did not leave one account active, he left all four socks active. He took no action. Would you please at least look at the case before shrugging me off? bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 12:19, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

It's not worth blocking the IPs, I just blocked the one that starts with "A" and tagged the user page of named accounts. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your time. bad·monkey _{talk to the {:()} :: 13:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the confusion. Next time I make a mistake like this I'll just ask you to fix it myself. It would have saved you and Badmonkey a few minutes. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Np. Don't worry about it. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

I've gone and answered more of my coaching questions, care to have a look? Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 10:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Responded. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:12, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

For clarification, I've never had an old username. I only had a rename, from User:Cro0016 to User:Steve Crossin. I also operate a bot account, User:SteveCrossinBot (on trial), but apart from that, I have no other accounts. I'm also an admin here. I think I need to get some more experience in more controversial areas, that was recommended in my editor review, which is in my signature. I could also use more experience with the Deletion process, particularity other types of deletion other than articles. Other than that,I'm not overly sure at the moment. I could use some more article work though, but the 24 Project has many opportunities there. Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 12:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Role accounts

What is a role account?--81.86.68.253 (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC) registered as Tyw7 Tyw7's Talk

See your talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:50, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:

I'm fine, just busy. :) Keilana| 11:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA notification..

Rlevse, in the future, please notify me when including me in an RFA. I would expect at least that courtesy from an admin. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 21:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

I did neglect that and it's my error. It was not intentional. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Aaron-Brandon

Could you please block these guys? Thanks. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Done. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:52, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Tyw7 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying/Proposed decision

"For this case, there are 13 active Arbitrators, so 8 votes are a majority." err ... 7, right? --GRuban (talk) 15:42, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Yep, fixed. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Link

I hope you don't mind, but I fixed a link here. Dreadstar † 16:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Tks. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Arb pages not orphaned

Hello. Your posts confused me a bit. This page is a redirect that is orphaned (see here). Its subject-space page is also a redirect (see here). I was deleting old talk page redirects where the subject-space page was a redirect. The redirects I was deleting were orphaned (no incoming links), had only one revision, and hadn't been touched in 30 days. Perhaps I'm missing something; let me know. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, as soon I posted I thought more about what you had been saying and realized that this had come up before. It has to do with the multiple definitions of "orphaned." Not orphaned as in CSD#G8, orphaned as in no incoming links. Thanks for the note. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

responsible (in part or in total) for ethnically cleansing wiki of a despised perspective.

Do we really have to put up with this from Juanita? I got a one week ban (a year ago) for a comment that was nowhere near this level of insulting? 09:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm. Can you get me the diff that got you blocked? Thanks for pointing this out. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:45, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, Your last block was over a year ago, so I suspect it is unrelated. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

The first third of the paragraph I have an issue with. The latter 2/3 is okay because she's saying 'if you do this to only one side...'. I've asked for evidence or a refactor and warned all. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I did warrent my 1 week holiday from editing as i did need to cool down, its just accusations of genocide are a bit much, her point that to be just all sides must be treated the same i see as "self evident". 12:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I understand. Keep me informed. She's had her warning. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:28, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I see where I am being informed on. It is clear that certain people are working their level best to get me removed from wiki. Lawrence Cohen and Hypnosadist and others have made no bones about this, and are working on it on the workshop page. In fact, if anyone reads the top section of the talk page with an open mind, the personal attacks against me and generalized anti-Zionist 'remarks' have passed without comment. Lawrence Cohen has made his very own proposal to block me indefinitely. I have not been going to anyone in response to the provocations dished out to me but I can certainly find plenty of evidence of them if anyone wants it. Comments such as this.

Regarding the remarks I made about wikiforPalestine. I was not accusing anyone in particular of anything. The evidence for my comments have to do with the very existence of the group and its requirements. The wikiforpalestine group is a group of 12 established editors here at wiki who were required to have demonstrated 'proof of anti-zionist edits.' It is clear that these (unknown) editors were well aware of the CAMERA issue here, as they followed the discussion that has been going on here at wiki; the proof is that they wrote to it on their Yahoo! page, even using my name to refute me, there until they suddenly disbanded. They met under a banner of divestment, boycott of Israel, and anti-Zionism. We know nothing about them -- not their wiki identities or positions or what they do here on wiki or outside. There is every reason to believe that they are attempting to cleanse wiki of a certain point of view and substitute another; and proof of that is essentially from their own group-statement. The "ethnic cleansing" statement I made had nothing to do with genocide- that was Hypnosadist's prejudicial imposition on my words. I will drop the ethnic part if that will make muster and talk only of 'cleansing wiki' of an zionist perspective if that is better. I tried to put up a screenshot of the group's statement for my talk page User_talk:Dajudem, but it was tagged for speedy deletion by Lawrence Cohen and gone in 5 minutes (+/-). If you would like to see it, let me know. Thanks. Juanita (talk) 23:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, clean up the stmt as much as you feel you can and give me link to that item, admins can still look at it, even if it was deleted. — Rlevse • Talk • 23:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Here is the link to the dif: Juanita (talk) 04:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

That's much better. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:17, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Because I believe that the accusations I made about Hypnosadist and Lawrence Cohen deserve some evidence, I put up some evidence at my talk page (bottom) of some of the really uncivil and inciting comments that were made to me here at wiki the first couple days of this investigation. There is plenty more where this came from, unfortunately... Juanita (talk) 01:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. Question. I already submitted a long statement on the evidence page. Can I change it, delete some, add some? Juanita (talk) 03:34, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you can change, add to, edit or delete evidence in your won evidence section. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Rlevse i'm leaving this arb, given that gross racist accusations are met with refactor it and its all ok but civil questions mean i am to be admonished for civility issues, i'm leaving before i get in more trouble. The none stop attacks are driving me to distraction, they started the moment Camera was caught and have not stopped for one day since. If you need to ask me a question come to my talk page, if kirill wants admonish me for asking a civil question too many times he may as well do it now, but i never misrepresented wikipolicy. 11:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Incivility on Request for Arb page

Hello. I notice that you're trying to maintain a civil atmosphere on the RFA CAMERA page (e.g. ). Could you perhaps similarly enjoin Eleland to immediately remove his insulting description of Gni/Ini (in his world they are the same person) as a witch? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gni (talk • contribs) 14:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I pinged him. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Gregory E. Miller (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thank you for adopting me and thanks for being my friend. Gregory E. Miller (talk) 13:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC))

User_talk:Shalom#Misplaced Pages:Suspected_sock_puppets/Iwazaki

Please take a look at this discussion on my talk page. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 16:42, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Responded there. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Question only you can answer

How do you reference information? When I looked it up on Misplaced Pages, It didn't make any sence to me. Gregory E. Miller (talk) 17:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC))

See your UC page. — Rlevse • Talk • 20:06, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages

Deleting "Template:Scoutlogo" is okay, but you should also delete the talk page, which in this case was also a redir. Talk pages should not be orphaned. Thanks — Rlevse • Talk • 09:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I didn't delete Template talk:Scoutlogo because it's linked to from an archived discussion, User talk:Gadget850/Archive 2007#Scoutlogo rationales. —Remember the dot 23:07, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Clerk stuff

On his talk page. Done. Ncmvocalist (talk)

Yeah, I self-reverted in the same minute I made the edit (it was just for fun).

At this exact point in time, I'm not sure if I'm in favour of having any official role on Misplaced Pages, excepting coordinating/maintaining the assessment dept. of a couple of WikiProjects - something I'll be doing a lot more of next month. I'll think about it after that though. Cheers for the info - Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Appeal archiving

Hi Rvlevse, thanks for archiving my appeal. Where has it been archived to? And can a clerk note be added citing jpgordon's instructions? I'd like to be able to link to case as closed from my user page. (I've already had one interested user ask me how I know the appeal was rejected.) Thanks in advance.--Thomas Basboll (talk) 07:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Made link, answered on your talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. Happy editing.--Thomas Basboll (talk) 10:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

RFAR update

Per Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard#Betacommand_blocked_for_sockpuppetry could you updated RFAR/BC and RFAR/BC_2 block sections? MBisanz 08:49, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Any admin can notate an arb block log. I'll go do these. — Rlevse • Talk • 09:55, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Arb clerk

Yes I am! Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 16:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

OK, let me work on it. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Hey there, I've decided to resume the admin coaching. I'm confident I can juggle all I'm doing at the moment, and do the admin coaching. Is that all OK with you? Steve Crossin (talk) (review) 16:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

SP

• Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. --evrik  16:47, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Oh yeah, User:English Subtitle is a sock of our friend. --evrik  16:51, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

1. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/CAMERA_lobbying/Workshop&diff=211227812&oldid=211208159
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/CAMERA_lobbying/Workshop&diff=211207460&oldid=211201345