| Revision as of 12:07, 17 May 2008 editBJBot (talk | contribs)271,036 edits BJBot, Image:Tfclogo.PNG is going to be deleted← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:59, 19 May 2008 edit undoJudgesurreal777 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,231 edits PROD nomination of D'Sparil. using TWNext edit → | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 12:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] (]) 12:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ==Proposed deletion of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A ] template has been added to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's ], and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "]" and ]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the ], the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the ] or it can be sent to ], where it may be deleted if ] to delete is reached. <small>Do you want to ] of receiving this notice?</small><!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 23:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:59, 19 May 2008
edit count | edit summary usage
 Archives |
|
December '04 – September '05
|
JoshuaGrant36
I'd like to inform you that User:JoshuaGrant36 is probably User:JoshuaGrant who is actually User:TheKittenBoy who also has an affinity for Tom and Jerry related edits. 128.227.87.100 (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- Might also want to check out Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_TheKittenBoy. 36 is the next one numerically. 128.227.87.100 (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kir Kanos
I have nominated Kir Kanos, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kir Kanos. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --EEMIV (talk) 03:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kirkanos.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kirkanos.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Virgin Killer
Thanks for actioning the RFP on this article. However, the version now protected contains the altered version of the album cover. Whether this cover should be altered or not is currently being discussed in an RFC. Until consensus is reached, the version of the page from before this edit-war should be retained. Until 8th May, the cover was the original one. The most recent revert, before protection, with the cover before the controversy is http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Virgin_Killer&oldid=211303267. As I understand policy, the image used should not change until a consensus is reached, or a decision made in another manner (e.g. legal action). Therefore, is it possible for you to restore the page to one showing the 'original' cover? Otherwise those trying to subvert the process of discussion by repeatedly changing the image used will have 'won. Thanks again, -- Chzz ► 18:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry. I apologise for reverting the image earlier. I understand fully why it's silly to get involved in 'revison wars'. At the time, I foolishly didn't understand that it had been changed back and forth so many times. As soon as I realised that the correct action would be a RFP, I found the correct place, and then saw that an RFP haad already been created by another user. I
then thanked him.
- Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on my talk page. I will consider your viewpoint and do some reading up. I believe that, whilst a matter is under discussiong, locking the page in any amended form is unfair, and the only fair policy would be to leave the original until the dispute is resolved. I will try to verify this by studying policy.
-- Chzz ► 19:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- Second apology. Having read WP:PREFER I now see that the actions you took were totally correct according to current policy. I also see there is some debate over this policy;
I'll put my comments in there.
-- Chzz ► 19:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- I'll echo Chzz's thanks for stoping the dumb revert war. Jclemens (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Nufy8 (talk) 22:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- With the greatest of respect, and without wishing to 'involve' you in the debate - I quite understand an admin must retain absolute neutrality, however; I feel obliged to raise the point that, in this specific case, I feel the protected page should be amended to have the picture as it was before this whole debate began, for the following reasons;
- Whilst the various debates take place, over however many days, people who read about this will look on wikipedia and see that action has been taken. This suggests to the 'outside world' that wikipedia has not followed their own policies and procedures regarding decisions
- If the revert does not take place in the near future, then whenever protection is removed a user (such as myself) might quite legitimately revert the image order, because no concensus was reached to amend it. That action is likely to provoke a further unconstructive edit war. If the page is protected again, or if protection is extended for a longer period, this will just emphasise the effect described in my first point.
- I hope I have presented myself clearly, and that you won't think I'm being obtuse over the issue. I am well aware of the debates going on elsewhere, but this specific point is separate from those. Apologies for taking your time over this, but I do think an important precedent exists.-- Chzz ► 22:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- With the greatest of respect, and without wishing to 'involve' you in the debate - I quite understand an admin must retain absolute neutrality, however; I feel obliged to raise the point that, in this specific case, I feel the protected page should be amended to have the picture as it was before this whole debate began, for the following reasons;
Virgin Killer - anti-policy
On my talk page, you said, "I'd rather err on the side of caution unless it's something blatantly anti-policy."
I requested an editprotected, to revert the 'dreaded' cover to the top of the page. Aside from all other issues, this was a reasonable request, because consensus had already established.
An admin refused the request.
That is 'blatantly anti-policy'.
Please perform the requested edit.
-- Chzz ► 05:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tfclogo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tfclogo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Proposed deletion of D'Sparil
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article D'Sparil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)