Revision as of 17:31, 25 May 2008 editLulu of the Lotus-Eaters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,790 edits 3rr examination | Revision as of 17:43, 25 May 2008 edit undoLulu of the Lotus-Eaters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,790 edits Fovean Author 3RRNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
''Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC'' | ''Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC'' | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "/* State legislature */")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214776206 by ] (])")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214832744 by ] (])Undue how? It happened and it got Obama his job")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214834444 by ] (])It ABSOLUTELY matters than a former Weatherman vetted him")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214840903 by ] (])Neither 'vetted' nor 'got him the job' appear in the article")</small> | ||
User frequently attempts to introduce extraneous material linking bio subject to ], to give ] weight to a prior campaign guilt-by-association tactice. A long serious of prior edits attempted to ] in a different section of the article, on the same topic: | |||
# <small>(edit summary: "] revision 213171020 by ] (])If it isn't, it should be")</small> | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 213171020 by ] (])If it isn't, it should be")</small> | ||
Line 12: | Line 20: | ||
# <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214466996 by ] (])Has nothing to do with campaign and everything to do with bio")</small> | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214466996 by ] (])Has nothing to do with campaign and everything to do with bio")</small> | ||
# <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214711970 by ] (])Let's just leave it as the consensus version while you consider")</small> | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214711970 by ] (])Let's just leave it as the consensus version while you consider")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "/* State legislature */")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214776206 by ] (])")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214832744 by ] (])Undue how? It happened and it got Obama his job")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214834444 by ] (])It ABSOLUTELY matters than a former Weatherman vetted him")</small> | ||
⚫ | # <small>(edit summary: "] revision 214840903 by ] (])Neither 'vetted' nor 'got him the job' appear in the article")</small> | ||
—<font color="darkgreen">]</font>×<font color="darkred" size="-2">]</font> 17:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | —<font color="darkgreen">]</font>×<font color="darkred" size="-2">]</font> 17:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
''Note'': This user seems likely to be a proxy or sockpuppet of ], who was recently blocked on same article for similar edits. This latter account has also reverted to the same "Fovean Author" version in the last 24 hours: | |||
# http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Barack_Obama&diff=214839484&oldid=214839051 |
Revision as of 17:43, 25 May 2008
User:Fovean Author reported by LotLE×talk (Result: )
- Three-revert rule violation on
Barack Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Fovean Author (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 17:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC
- 05:21, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "/* State legislature */")
- 13:10, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214776206 by Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters (talk)")
- 14:06, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214832744 by Newross (talk)Undue how? It happened and it got Obama his job")
- 14:29, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214834444 by Ultraexactzz (talk)It ABSOLUTELY matters than a former Weatherman vetted him")
- 15:09, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214840903 by Newross (talk)Neither 'vetted' nor 'got him the job' appear in the article")
User frequently attempts to introduce extraneous material linking bio subject to Bill Ayers, to give WP:UNDUE weight to a prior campaign guilt-by-association tactice. A long serious of prior edits attempted to WP:SOAPBOX in a different section of the article, on the same topic:
- 03:29, 18 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 213171020 by Newross (talk)If it isn't, it should be")
- 04:36, 18 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 213185598 by Tvoz (talk)If you want to make changes, get a consensus")
- 10:47, 20 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 213644627 by Newross (talk)Absolutely there is consensus on this - you apologists have been trying to undo it")
- 11:14, 20 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 213678141 by Brothejr (talk)Perhaps you missed the giant article on this?")
- 02:38, 21 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undo disruptive edits / violation of 3 rr's policy")
- 16:04, 24 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214466996 by Johnpseudo (talk)Has nothing to do with campaign and everything to do with bio")
- 04:52, 25 May 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 214711970 by Modocc (talk)Let's just leave it as the consensus version while you consider")
—LotLE×talk 17:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Note: This user seems likely to be a proxy or sockpuppet of User:Kossack4Truth, who was recently blocked on same article for similar edits. This latter account has also reverted to the same "Fovean Author" version in the last 24 hours: