Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:27, 8 June 2008

Archives
– July 2006 – October 2006 – November 2006 – January 2007 – 12 March 2007 – 5 May 2007 – 8 Sept 2007 – Dec 2007 – Feb 2008 – March 2008 – 12 May 2008 –

Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here

Panathinaikos FC

Well can you please make it clear to the user Karagounis that wiki is about facts and not personal preferences.He keeps reverting the article in order not to include Nikopolidis and Konstantinou in the notable past players only because of his sentiment towards them when they moved to Olympiakos team a couple of years ago.

They keep adding also a 1911 championship when the Greek FA was established in mid-20ies and noone recognized the title.I don't really want to be involved in a constant revert war to state the obvious.Maybe you can explain him.Eagle of Pontus

• OK understood.To tell you the truth i didn't know that there was actually a 3 times revert rule,as i am thinking it, it makes sense.Thanks for the advice. Eagle of Pontus

Ante Pavelic

Please, do not contribute to the edit war here. You are an administrator - aren't you??? I verified the context and saw it well-referenced and accurate.

Hi There

I have wanted to smile at you for a long time

Why Wiki Why (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Kosovo Intro

Please add your suggested changes and post results @ http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Kosovo&action=edit&section=29

You are not fair at all

You banned the Greeks,because they think it is not fair,to use the term Republic of Macedonia,cause is not recognized from the united nations...You use fascists methods to spread F.Y.R.O.M S PROPAGANDA ON INTERNET....i will find the way to report you to other administrators...behaviours like yours are a shame for wikipedia,you are insulting all of us....This country has the name F.Y.R.O.M.official name not Macedonia or Republic of Macedonia...so be wise and change the name yourself..your actions are offensive and are giving power to hate and racism...i hope you will understand finally..

A Tale of Two Cities

Hello,

You edited the A Tale of Two Cities Misplaced Pages entry in March by revealing the ending of the book in the first paragraph of the introduction of the entry, where no spoilers are meant to appear. I was casually reading only the introduction entry, taking care not to read any further, 3/4 of the way through the book, when the ending was ruined for me by you. I would have preferred that you had left the intentional mistake there, inaccurate though it was. I hope you're pleased with yourself.

Josh Burkart Davis, CA, US

Unnecessary Comment

Man, what is your problem? All I did was leave a comment on a discussion page providing information about something that is inaccessible to most users, and your response is to go and leave a jerky comment on my talk page.

Advice

I advice you regarding violation of user:DIREKTOR for this restriction. Always DIREKTOR persists in several edit wars pushing his POV statements. Articles involved:

• Republic of Ragusa
• Albania Veneta
• Dalmatian Italians‎
• Josip Broz Tito
• Foibe massacres‎
• Istrian exodus‎
• many others.

You can control history of these articles for evidence! Regards and best wishes. Nemo, 1 May 2008

Proposal

I hope all this madness with me is over. My proposal is that you symbolically release my account after so much time banned and I will discuss with you every new source as reliable before representing them User:Dodona

Your manipulation at Sarah Wiener article

I'm fully aware that you did this change not coming from your own knowledge or personal interest, but on behalf of the editors of that Article in the German section of wikipedia.

But I could only laugh about your try on the English version. What do you think what will happen, when I put a link to that article in an email to a animal right protection society in USA? That the German wikipedia is lost to the Vereinsmeierei is well know. But over here in the English section, it will only cost you any write privileges you have.

I know you will delete this forstanding text. Pity yourself for your misbehaviour.

DieWeisseRose: "That group and its archive have been deleted."

have you been able to find out when? there are 12 members belonging to wikiforpalestine who criteria for belonging required proof of pro-palestinian/anti-israel bias, active at wiki. should DieWeisseRose have a higher loyalty to a group undermining wiki?? the answer to this will prove that the wiki model is a failure in contentious issues. i would like to thank you for ignoring my request given earlier. it also demonstrates what wiki is all about.Davidg (talk)

BULGARIAN ETHNOGENESIS

Hey stop removing sourced data, that is a real data that describes Bulgarian anthropology from the snpa nordish website. Bulgarians are not only characterized by Mediterranean, there are other features as well like nordic, dinaric, central asian turanid, slavic and alpine. Bulgarians are mixed with all these types NOT JUST MEDITERRANEAN. In fact mediterranean are quite low. Mediterraneans are only in countries like spain, portugal, italy, greece and the middle eastern countries. NOT BULGARIA! So don't mess up the ethnogenesis section because I have given important sourced information from a good website. And the paragraph about relation to anatolian turks and armenians is total rubbish and that source is corrupt. Bulgarians are related to romanians, macedonians, bosnians and croats. Bulgarians are balkan people not middle easterners. Bulgarians have nothing to do with the middle easterners or the mediterraneans. As fact says Bulgarians are people that descended from a mix of indigeounous balkan people like the thracians and the illyrians, slavs, celts, central asian bulgars from western china of iranic stock and germanics.

Well the macedonian data which you say is unacceptable is unknown as i have nothing to do with it. BUT PLEASE leave the ethnogenesis section alone except that macedonian paragraph. delete that macedonian section if its unacceptable!--Ivailo82 (talk) 19:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Future, I see the chapter about Bulgarian ethnogenesis is fully vandalized from user as Ivailo 82. Please, bring it into order! Jingby (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Images, copyrights

Here and here. Are they ok? Have the Balkanese finally learned how to correctly upload pictures? 3rdAlcove (talk) 07:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Με έγραψες ωρε Φράγκε; Ούτε μια απάντηση για τους τύπους δλδ. 3rdAlcove (talk) 11:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Those two photographs seem more or less harmless to me. One could probably nitpick and find that there's this or that gap in their descriptions, but on the face of it the PD claims aren't too implausible, I'd say. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

THX 3rdAlcove (talk) 11:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Permision

Can i upload some images in this page,they are copies from book,black and white,also you must see judgement on commons in problem which you report there. I'm waiting answer on my page??--Makedonij (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Isn't this vandalism here?--Makedonij (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for help.--Makedonij (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Problem with MOST (Association)

I have started to edit the mentioned article and after two minutes the article has been deleted by the administrator User:Cobaltbluetony without any reason or warning. I wrote him twise but obviously he doesnt want to answer me. I will ask you lake an administrator if you can to revert it so I can continue my work. I plan to finish the article and after that if you think that the article is not good delete it or live it like that. here are the reasons why the article should be there:

• The biggest NGO in Macedonia
• Participate on many elections in European countries
• Has more than 10.000 members...so on.

and I hope so that you will understand my problem. Regards--Raso mk (talk) 22:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have to back up Raso here - see --Laveol 12:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Please revert the article because there were good references that I cannot find them right now. And there was a good stub. Thank you --Raso mk (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

re Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hegumen_again

I thought that you, as the blocking admin, may be interested in reviewing/commenting per the above. Cheers. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Serbia

I do not know if you have noticed but there is small problem (and there is no controversy) in this article. During this year User:NeroN BG is deleting [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Serbia&diff=202523439&oldid=202519047 again] and again without explanation Holocaust accepted sources (USHMM, Yad Vashem, and Jewish Virtual Library) and changing them with Jasenovac research institute (this is not Jasenovac museum) which is having aim to :"understand the true context and history of war crimes and civil wars in Balkan history" . During february 2008 I have tried to start discussion about sources .He has not answered but only continued to delete again and again statements from USHMM, Yad Vashem and Jewish Virtual Library . I am sure that in next few days he will again delete statements confirmed with this sources..--Rjecina (talk) 03:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Oversight

Hi. Can you please clarify something for me, if you know about this? Editors are not allowed to modify or remove other editors comments - right? If editor A has made a comment including the fact that editor B is the author of an article (presumably editor B's name is on the article), is editor B allowed to modify/remove the comment? Isn't it meant to be left alone and referred to requests for oversight? (particularly because editor B is clearly involved in a dispute with editor A) Cheers. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't know the backgrounds (especially not how and why A thought he knew B was the author of that paper, and whether B really had a legitimate reason to expect that information was private), but supposing for the sake of argument that B's complaint is legitimate, removal strikes me as okay. Note that offending edits on a high-traffic page need to be reverted quickly, before oversight can even get active. If many people have added more comments after an edit, there's no way even oversight could get rid of it later. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

OK. This is concerning an editor who was already warned by a notable admin not to remove or alter other people's comments and explicitly told "Mucking with the comments of others is not acceptable. If you feel something is inappropriate, please raise the issue to the attention of uninvolved administrators, via WP:ANI or another appropriate venue". See my edit summary on this edit . Then he reverts it and leaves this bogus warning on my page . Please look into it. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ethnic Macedonians template

Oh, sorry! I think I updated the template per another edit request, and later that day another editor contacted me about an image vote that appeared to be concluded, with consensus favouring the sun image. So I didn't think much of it when I requested the edit (and would've done it myself if I knew how). I hadn't realised that there was so much controversy about it, but I knew nothing of the image etc. so apologies. Ooh, what a response on the talk page though; oh well, it's hardly unexpected as my edit was much more controversial than it first seemed!! So apologies, and thanks for letting me know. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 08:50, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Hegumen

I apologize for evading my ban. Please see this. --124.182.46.34 (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Would it be out of the question to have my comment reposted prior to the expiration of my ban? --124.182.46.34 (talk) 18:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I guess I just cracked. It's really quite stressful having to refute such things. I'm sorry for causing such a disruption. I think I'll take a break, completely abandon my current account and possibly create a new one some time in the near future. It was nice working with you. --124.182.139.162 (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Nomination

Gee, I'd have to nominate them in a new section? I'd rather not bother at all, tbh. They don't bother me and the usual suspects might cry "WIKI RACISM". What's the point in nominating any if "we keep dealing with these kinds of userpage elements and they keep bouncing back at us." anyway? Freedumb for everyone. 3rdAlcove (talk) 19:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

His Way

Hey Fut.Perf., long time no talk! I was looking at the recent edit war at Komotini, and I have to say that Aee1980 (talk · contribs) reminds me of our old friend. Do you think he wants it Hiswayyy? ;-) Khoikhoi 11:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

All we like sheep
Have gone astra-a-a-a-a-a-ayyyy
We have turnèd
Everyone to his own wa-a-ayyyyy....

See, old friendship never loses its fascination... :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Blair Witch image

Yes, please undelete and let me know when you do so, so I can go in and fix it. Thanks for the offer. - Arcayne () 17:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Might I truble you to take a gander at it so as to ensure it has been licensed and summarized correctly? - Arcayne () 18:19, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Looks fine to me. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, and thanks for re-adding it to the article. I now have it in my watchlist, to keep an eye on it. I might as well check out and watchlist the images in the other articles I am working on. - Arcayne () 18:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Protection

Can he really do that? --Laveol 19:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Try logging out and editing the page, and you'll see if his protection worked :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:03, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Serbia

As you saw,I am fighting against anti-serbian propaganda.I will not allow to Croats ,and similar to write bad things about Serbia and their personal opinions.I deleted things about some 'attrocities' etc.And I will do it again.Maybe you support their opinions.If someone is overtly tendentious and non-neutral,that is User:R-41 and User:Rjecina . You can stop me,but you can't stop the truth.

User:Bg007

Ok,honestly,you are so complicate about rules to upload a image.You deleted numerous time,so I thought that is the easiest way for upload.Sorry about this,it will not happen again. User:Bg007 There are 5 images: File:Beli Dvor unutrasnjost.jpg , File:White Castle Art.jpg, File:White Castle1.jpg, File:Image:White Castle1.jpg, File:Beli Dvor pogled.jpg And 'cause you speak many languages well,are you a team(CIA or MI5) or one person? Cheers! User:Bg007

Ma Again

About baned from uploading,did you see this ? Maybe you will want to put another opinion there? Dont judge me becouse my bad english, i didn't want to enoy nobody (almost). See that page please and then a tell me what do you think? --Makedonij (talk) 20:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Can you protected then, from unregistred users?--Makedonij (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

image

Hi, thats alright if you choose to ban me for a short while. Just a question how can i upload picture's like banner/masthead or the flag? I know they arent self made but i didnt know what other category to post them under? Could you please tell me for future reference.? PMK1 (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

hi, can i have my image ban reverted so that i can upload this image which will be of great use to this article, Macedonian Australians. I will add this tag to it and post as NON-FREE. {tl|non-free logo}}. is that alrite??? PMK1 (talk) 13:39, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't really see why we would want a logo image of a periodical we don't even have an article on? Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Becuase it would go well in the Media Section where the Newspapers are listed. I plan on fully updating the page and will write about Makedonska Iskra. Also the newspaper was the leading symbol of macedonian unity for nearly two decades, it finished with the MAPL. Is that alrite? PMK1 (talk) 00:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

serbia

Bg007 is jeopardizing not only the Serbia article but also other Balkan-related ones in a biased and vandal-like manner. He should be denied the rights to continue doing so until he proves himself to be at least a semi-proffessional editor. Regards, NeroN_BG

UfD?

Ugh, XfD where X="User" does not exist yet, does it? :-) NikoSilver 12:14, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

It does, almost. :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Much tempted to officialize it... NikoSilver 13:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

OK,what do you have against me?? You think that i'm nationalist ?? NO I'M NOT!!! I'm fighter for freedom, for all peoples, but it is not shure if that could be saied for others, who dont like me!!--Makedonij (talk) 14:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok Future p.s, why are you not answering me ?--Makedonij (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps he is too busy laughing. - Arcayne () 17:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Dodona clone ??

FP i can be clone , it is not my fall that the other support me, please do not delete the sources nothing it is made up or it si fake , I hope you define my ban afterall because i had enough.Greeks are lying can you see. What idea of mine you exactly oppose and why??Can we have a deal i will respected it.

But, Dodona, one of your sources actually states that the upper macedonians, tribes considered akin to the Epirotes I believe, were greek-speaking. What would Pirro Burri say? 3rdAlcove (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I think you got a long tradition in bilingualisem.

FP can we discuss my proposel?--Shqiptari i epirit (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

References

Something for you, please this is not in Macedonian so you could probebly read it!-)--Makedonij (talk) 15:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

• Name dispute or ethnic misdeeds?
• Aegean Macedonians Address To UNHCR
• Yugoslav Scholar Accuses Bulgarians of "Genocide"
• The Holocaust in Macedonia, 1941-1944
• Greek Evidence on the Authenticity of the Macedonians
• The Balkan Wars and the Partition of Macedonia (Council for Research Into South-Eastern Europe of the Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts)
• Macedonia: Reaching Out to Win Latin American Hearts and Minds
• Gruevski attends gathering of Macedonians from Aegean Macedonia

Come on, now. Macedonian genocide? There were "ethnic cleansings" all over the Balkans at that time but that's ridiculous. Since 1800(!), no less... 3rdAlcove (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

With a genocide raging that long, its a wonder that any are left, or are busy editing Misplaced Pages, instead of fleeing the death squads.;) - Arcayne () 17:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Thats a tad distastefull. PMK1 (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Does that refer to Arcayne's comment or Makedonij's intellectual pornography? --Tsourkpk (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

lol, the comment. Who would have thought "intellectual pornography" was a word :L. PMK1 (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image: MakAlbania

Future Perfect... I think I already wrote my argument done earlier, if it was possible to create an image then someone would have done it by now (obviously). Look, the only complaints I'm getting from are Greeks, it figures that every little error is immediately argued against. I wonder how many Greek photos are under the same situation. If I were to do the same action, it would be reasonable that you would state an argument and simply ignore my statements. The photo contains more then just the flag, it also contains Macedonians, buildings and environment. We had another photo which contained that but it got deleted (I'm sure you had NOTHING to do with it). Anyways, its like an image fully shown and one zoomed in to show just a certain item. If its such a big deal I'll change the caption. Mactruth (talk) 07:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

1) When another photo is AVAILABLE it will be replaced, until then it should remain, it doesn't mean its laziness. You forget that Macedonians in Albania hardly have running water let alone COMPUTERS and I live half way around the world and find it a bit challenging to go there with my schedule at the moment (Sorry I don't know if you get paid to be on Misplaced Pages for being an administrator, but I dont).

2) Sorry, but I myself feel Greeks on Misplaced Pages are given a lot more freedom to say or write what they want. And I understand your liberal but it is difficult for an outsider to comprehend Macedonia.

3) I have viewed many many many photos that are copyright violations, yet no arguments to them. For the images, many Greek photos are conveniently "self made" whether it be a singer or tanks. I suggest you take a good look and go through them when possible.

4) I don't view the non-free images as showing the same things. Yes, one does have the flag but it also contains many other features to itself that are unique, but if that is the case I will simply update another image that is dangerously similar. Mactruth (talk) 08:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Just to show you how far it goes, look at this ] and read the information BEFORE I edited it. This page has been snuck into Misplaced Pages for TWO YEARS without any administrator raising a word which has been created by Greeks with an intent to MONOPOLIZE the term Macedonia. The article (before my editing) was pure Greek POV and only talked about Greek Macedonia, yet they tried to sell this as the "modern Macedonia" without any statements or reviews from any administrator. Two years?! Mactruth (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Also, the Macedonia Naming Dispute is rediculously POV bias towards the Greek side, any argumentation from Macedonians that make Greece look bad are not included for a variety of reasons, why arent these informations included?

• http://www.sofiaecho.com/article/greek-macedonian-name-dispute-leads-to-ban-on-lamb-meat/id_28781/catid_68
• http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/9768/
• http://theboard.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/shame-on-greece-messing-with-macedonia/
• http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/1192/45/
• http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/1330/45/
• http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/1634/1/
• http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/1577/1/
• http://www.mia.com.mk/portal/page?_pageid=113,166290&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&VestID=46539078&prikaz=3

I also have sources (cant find them rite now) in which Greek priests state to take over Macedonia. Yet none of these are in the Misplaced Pages article Mactruth (talk) 08:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Macedonia naming dispute is terrible, I know that. But that has nothing to do with your image uploads. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Moldova

Destroying the possessed host helped a bit, but the restless spirit remains at large and as relentless as ever. Requesting consecration. --Illythr (talk) 19:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

If you can prove that Romanian language is not spoken at all....

...Then the Moon will collapse into a cheese singularity, depriving the Universe of this much loved product. Oy vey. --Illythr (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Tose Proeski

How would I go about properly copyrighting that picture Image:Tose Proeski.JPG? I believe I simply am copyrighting in the wrong fashion. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Mactruth (talk) 22:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm afraid not. It's clearly non-free, and you already made the best fair use case for it that could be made. But it's just not good enough. Pictures from commercial news sources are almost always off-limits to us (except when we need to explicitly talk about the image as an object of encyclopedic coverage in its own right), because with our coverage we are essentially entering into competition with them. If you want an image of the guy, I guess your best bet is to look round on things like flickr for amateur photographers who took pictures at concerts or something, and ask one if he would release it for us. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

History of modern Macedonia

The article History of modern Macedonia is a POV pushing article because it is trying to assort the only modern Macedonia is the Greek Macedonia, when in fact Greek Macedonia is part of the region of Macedonia. The article is trying to monopolize the term Macedonia and should be looked at carefully. Mactruth (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

A differentiation is needed btw Republic of Macedonia and Greek Macedonia. Stating "modern Macedonia" is to state any part of the region of Macedonia, or the entire part of Macedonia... and this term cannot be used exclusively for Greek Macedonia. Please look into this. Mactruth (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

I have made the issue of history of modern Macedonia clear for a while now without any response. Please read "Discussion" of each and you will understand why I did that (not out of monopolization or propaganda). I find it one sided that Kekrops complaints are responded to immediately while my complaints, which are legitimate, have been ignored thus far Mactruth (talk) 06:25, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

ps: I will continue to protest until history of modern Macedonia name is changed to allow differentiation btw Greek Macedonia and Republic of Macedonia to occur. Mactruth (talk) 06:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Image

Yeah, I'm new to the whole image-deletion thing; sorry if I seem overly cautious! There was a tag on there saying that there was a grace period, so I thought I'd de-tag it until that had passed (11 June, I think). But yes, there was nothing wrong with the criteria, and it should be deleted, but I've seen other admins decline deletions until that grace period is over, so I thought cautiousness was needed.

Actually, scratch the above, I just realised that it was an invalid fair-use claim, and not simply because it was unused. Right, sorry for the hassle, deleted. :D Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Zdravo

Hy, Fut.Pf. i found some numbers of Bulgarians in the world here,is that a reliable sorce, i mean can i insert them in Bulgarians article, most of the infos there is just from Bulgarian foregin ministry. And my apologise to you in first place if i offend you. --Makedonij (talk) 10:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I've come across "Joshuaproject" before, it's quite certainly not a good source. I would recommend against using it. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok, fine, no using.--Makedonij (talk) 18:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

National Liberation War of Macedonia

Hi there. I just wanted to let you know that a Request for Comment was added to Talk:National Liberation War of Macedonia regarding a content dispute between User:Revizionist and User:Kobra85. Basically, both editors believe their respective versions of the article are "better" than the other's, with regard to WP:N, WP:RS, WP:V and WP:NPOV. I've been trying to defuse the edit war between them, warned them both about WP:3RR, etc., and in the process, Kobra85 said that he had made extensive edits to the article that you requested. Since he's named you, I figured it would be best to ask for your opinion on the content.

I do not have any strong opinion on either version since I have no knowledge of the subject. The extent of my participation has been to explain general policies and to try to keep these two settled down enough to where they can work constructively.

Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 17:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

IP Problems

Hi there, I'm having trouble with an anonymous disgruntled Serbian editor. His IP keeps jumping, but it's obviously the same person. The problem is less his edits, and more his vitriolic edit summaries.

79.101.246.57 (talk · contribs)

77.46.217.231 (talk · contribs)

79.101.247.52 (talk · contribs)

I've left a very polite civility warning here, which led to the final message. He apparently hasn't figured out how to attack my user page or talk page yet, and anyway it seems like a block would be problematic given his range. I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to handle this. Thanks! // Chris 00:28, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Raso mk/MOST

Hallo. I have finished editing the article about MOST and now take a look at the article and tell me whether it is good and if it is good revert it and make it a real article. I have one graphic that shows the organizational structure of Most, is it good to be put on the article? Regards --Raso mk (talk) 15:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Greece and Epirus, Kosovo Vandalism

I had written some real facts about Greece, Epirus and Kosovo.

Greece facts proven by BBC and CNN reports. Epirus facts true from many years, reported by historian and discovered in a research in 2005. Kosovo is INCORRECTLY spelled, since It's populated with Albanians, it IS THE RIGHT OF ALBANIANS TO NAME IT, and it's real name is KosovA!

I'm very dissappointed with your service, you are unable to verify real facts and just remove what you think not true, I want to contribute but in this circumstances it is IMPOSSIBLE!

AND THIS http://my.telegraph.co.uk/f_off_telegraph_censors/may_2008/country_list_of_most_homosexuals_born_live.htm IS A SERIOUS TELEGRAPH! HOW THE HELL YOU KNOW THAT IT ISN'T? GO GET A LIFE, MAN!