| Revision as of 23:20, 30 August 2005 editAlison (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators47,261 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:15, 31 August 2005 edit undo24.224.153.40 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| <!-- Comments below here, kiddiez --> | <!-- Comments below here, kiddiez --> | ||
| Hello. It is POV to say that his actions were "egregious" (''Wordnet: conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible''). Misplaced Pages is not here to judge what is "outrageously bad"; we present information in an npov way and try to not abuse adjectives. You can leave it up to the reader to judge whether his actions were "egregious" (and especially whether they were the ''most'' egregious). I'm not defending his actions, but if we present the facts, then readers should be able to judge for themselves that he egregious without us preaching it to them. ] 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:15, 31 August 2005
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Hello. It is POV to say that his actions were "egregious" (Wordnet: conspicuously and outrageously bad or reprehensible). Misplaced Pages is not here to judge what is "outrageously bad"; we present information in an npov way and try to not abuse adjectives. You can leave it up to the reader to judge whether his actions were "egregious" (and especially whether they were the most egregious). I'm not defending his actions, but if we present the facts, then readers should be able to judge for themselves that he egregious without us preaching it to them. 24.224.153.40 00:15, 31 August 2005 (UTC)