Misplaced Pages

User talk:Smith Jones: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:08, 27 June 2008 editLAAFan (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,049 edits →Thanks: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 06:15, 30 June 2008 edit undoColonel Warden (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,041 edits Homeopathy/WarningNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


Thanks for the barnstar! That was my first RickK.--]] 17:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the barnstar! That was my first RickK.--]] 17:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==
Your recent edit seems disruptive. To avoid doubt, please note this warning. ] (]) 06:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

{{Homeopathy/Warning}}

Revision as of 06:15, 30 June 2008

Archiving icon
Archives

My archive (Archive 2)


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

User talk:Smith Jones/My carhive <---ARCHIVE

Given the level of dysfunction that has come to prevail on Misplaced Pages, the most appropriate course for a principled scientist is to withdraw from the project.

The bureaucracy should either take corrective steps to fix this situation, or else suffer the eventual loss of huge amounts of valuable talent and volunteered resources.

If you agree with this statement, post it to your pages, and pass it on. (discuss this here)


Neutral viewpoint

Thanks for your contribution here. It's a shame that if you had a problem with my conduct you didn't say to me first as I did with the user in question. It wasn't my intention to "rat" anyone out I just wanted a neutral opinion. Difficult to get round here. Mallanox 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Alan Cabal

Hey: I added two more sources about the Zundel article. Now the thing to do is actually find out the title of Alan Cabal's article and the date. It is in Counterpunch somewhere.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

It looks like the article is coming along nicely. I contacted Counterpunch about making the article about Zundel available on their web site so that people can read it. Who knows what will become of that but it would be a big help. It's always better for someone to go read the source when it's this controversial.-Manhattan Samurai (talk) 00:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks. It's always nice to get a barnstar! The debates around what to include or exclude oftens seems not so much about the information itself, but about the status of having a Misplaced Pages article on the information - by having an article it means that information pops up on Google searches, and gets mirrored on other sites. Some people feel strongly that certain bits of information, especialy regarding individuals, shouldn't get such a priority treatment. I can understand that view. My own personal inclination is toward the merging of information into parent articles where possible. SilkTork * 10:06, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar! That was my first RickK.--LAAFan 17:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Homeopathy

Your recent edit seems disruptive. To avoid doubt, please note this warning. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.