| Revision as of 21:07, 16 June 2008 editBlaze The Movie Fan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,949 edits →WP:Featured article candidate/Will Smith: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:07, 16 July 2008 edit undoBenjiboi (talk | contribs)50,496 edits →Archiving talk page threads at Talk:Racism: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| If you feel like Will Smith should be featured, you should start making this page. Even if it's not ready it would be great if people could point out the problems, if you really think the article is ready to be featured please make this page. Also don't forget to list it on ], good luck. ] (]) 21:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | If you feel like Will Smith should be featured, you should start making this page. Even if it's not ready it would be great if people could point out the problems, if you really think the article is ready to be featured please make this page. Also don't forget to list it on ], good luck. ] (]) 21:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Archiving talk page threads at ] == | |||
| Hi, ] is waaaay too huge with over 115 talk threads. Would you be willing to help tag talk sections with {{TL|resolved}} and {{tl|stale}} as appropriate so we can start archiving old talk threads? Even a few at time will help! Thank you! ] 22:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:07, 16 July 2008
Oral stimulation of nipples
Hooah - I agree with you that the article is a complete waste of time and isn't notable enough to be there. Edison seems to be a devout inclusionist. Hopefully it will get deleted! Fingers crossed! Cheers. Scarian 17:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Religiosity and intelligence
Hi YVNP.
You've flagged the Religiosity and intelligence page as containing inaccuracies. Any chance you could drop a note or two in the discussion page so we can improve it? WotherspoonSmith (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
2 Girls 1 Cup
Hi, please provide a source for the notability of those shocksites and also place them in the correct section. You placed them in the "Origins" section, where they most certainly do not belong. Are they parodies? Then they belong in the "Parodies" section. Also a source is needed to tell us why we should care. If this article is to survive it needs to perfectly meet Misplaced Pages's requirements, so I am vigorously defending the article from becoming bloated with Internet cruft. Only sourced entries are wanted. Thank you. — Ocatecir 15:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- The sites are notable because they were created by the same guy, have also been viewed by celebrities, and at least one(4girlsfingerpainting) is actually an old vid with an article from something awful. Check scribblewiki for the article.YVNP (talk) 18:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Then maybe you can post a reliable source saying that. We aren't going to take your word for it. It needs to be mentioned by a reliable 3rd party source. I don't know what scribblewiki is, but it isn't part of the wikimedia foundation. — Ocatecir 18:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know how to link to other websites too well. Theres a link on the shock site talk page. On this page under the section swap.avi is link to the article in question. If you look at 4girlsfingerpainting it's the same video. The site owner says he is the creator of the shock sites although it may not be true. Even if he's not the sites ride off each others success and it is clear that they are related. I don't think they serve big mentions but come on. http://www.2girls1finger.com has also been watched by celebrites as well. Although 2girls1finger may have a non notable relationship, 4girlsfingerpainting is related and notable.YVNP (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't see how they are notable. A mention from a 3rd party reliable source would help. Lets leave it out of the article until their relevance is established. — Ocatecir 01:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know how to link to other websites too well. Theres a link on the shock site talk page. On this page under the section swap.avi is link to the article in question. If you look at 4girlsfingerpainting it's the same video. The site owner says he is the creator of the shock sites although it may not be true. Even if he's not the sites ride off each others success and it is clear that they are related. I don't think they serve big mentions but come on. http://www.2girls1finger.com has also been watched by celebrites as well. Although 2girls1finger may have a non notable relationship, 4girlsfingerpainting is related and notable.YVNP (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Then maybe you can post a reliable source saying that. We aren't going to take your word for it. It needs to be mentioned by a reliable 3rd party source. I don't know what scribblewiki is, but it isn't part of the wikimedia foundation. — Ocatecir 18:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
In the edit summary of one of your edits to the article, you asked for someone to help you with citing sources. Misplaced Pages has a page about that: Misplaced Pages:Citing sources --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 12:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikirage
Very cool site. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Alatari (talk) 17:42, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
WP:Featured article candidate/Will Smith
If you feel like Will Smith should be featured, you should start making this page. Even if it's not ready it would be great if people could point out the problems, if you really think the article is ready to be featured please make this page. Also don't forget to list it on WP:FAC, good luck. TheBlazikenMaster (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Archiving talk page threads at Talk:Racism
Hi, Talk:Racism is waaaay too huge with over 115 talk threads. Would you be willing to help tag talk sections with {{resolved}} and {{stale}} as appropriate so we can start archiving old talk threads? Even a few at time will help! Thank you! Banjeboi 22:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)