Misplaced Pages

Electoral fraud: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:19, 5 September 2005 edit66.231.38.97 (talk) Techniques: added example← Previous edit Revision as of 22:36, 5 September 2005 edit undo66.231.38.97 (talk) History: additionNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


History is full of notorious examples of electoral fraud, especially (and ironically) in advanced democracies where such crimes tend to be noticed, reported, and corrected. Examples include the ] ] in 20th Century Chicago and ] in 19th Century New York. Although the penalties for getting caught may be severe, the rewards for succeeding are likely to be immense, encouraging perpetrators to continue their fraudulence. Also, in recent times, accusations of ] are often made to counter those alleging election fraud. History is full of notorious examples of electoral fraud, especially (and ironically) in advanced democracies where such crimes tend to be noticed, reported, and corrected. Examples include the ] ] in 20th Century Chicago and ] in 19th Century New York. Although the penalties for getting caught may be severe, the rewards for succeeding are likely to be immense, encouraging perpetrators to continue their fraudulence. Also, in recent times, accusations of ] are often made to counter those alleging election fraud.

] seized power in ], ], ], and ] from nominally-democratic governments between 1946 and 1948 with the aid of electoral fraud and maintained formal power through ]s.


==Countering Fraud== ==Countering Fraud==

Revision as of 22:36, 5 September 2005

Electoral fraud is the deliberate interference with the process of an election. Fraud can be used to inflate the votes for the favored candidate or deflate the votes of the opposition.

Techniques

Inflating the vote can be accomplished by buying or coercing votes from persons who would normally vote for another candidate or would not vote at all, but who are nevertheless eligible to vote; by registering false voters such as the deceased; by recording multiple votes from a single voter; or by subverting the vote counting process itself (such as "stuffing" a ballot box with false ballots before the actual vote begins, or bribing those persons who count the ballots).

Deflating the vote can by accomplished by intimidating voters and preventing them from voting (such as by voter suppression, random violence near polling places or other forms of electioneering), by controlling the ballot counting process, or by "losing" or "misplacing" ballot boxes. The vote can also be deflated by interfering with postal or absentee ballots, or disqualifying them on technical grounds. For example, the perpetrator of the fraud could require signatures on absentee military ballots after they have been cast but before they have been counted. More dramatic is "four-legged voting," where precinct workers would pull the levers on voting machines instead of the voter; this was once practiced in Chicago.

It has always been possible to alter voting machines so that they only record votes for a single candidate. Recently, however, a method of electoral fraud that has worried political activists is hacking electronic voting schemes to prevent ballots from being registered or by making them appear to select the wrong candidate. Identity theft is likely to become an issue if Internet voting schemes are implemented, since obtaining public records concerning registered voters is almost as easy as casting a "secure" vote using someone else's identity.

One simple, but notorious method of electoral fraud is the shoe polish method, which is often used in company towns. This method entails coating the voting-lever or voting-button of the opposing candidate(s) with shoe polish. To understand how this works, take the example of an employee of the company who, against the advice of the party in power, votes for the opposing candidate(s). After they leave the voting booth, a conspirator to the fraud (a precinct captain or other local V.I.P.) will handshake the voter. The conspirator will then subtlely check their hand for any shoe polish and will note that the voter has left some shoe polish after the handshake. Soon that unfortunate voter gets fired from their job.

In Britain, one historically popular technique has been long known as granny farming, after a contemptuous slang designation for retirement homes. In this, party activists visit retirement homes, purportedly to help the elderly and immobile exercise their voting rights. Residents are asked to fill out 'absentee voter' forms, allowing them a proxy or postal vote. When the forms are signed and gathered, they are then secretly rewritten as applications for proxy votes, naming party activists or their friends and relatives as the proxies. These people, unknown to the voter, then cast the vote for the party of their choice. This trick relies on elderly care home residents typically being absent-minded, or suffering from dementia, or otherwise unlikely to cause a fuss.

Additionally, votes can also be influenced by counting. If the counting of votes is done out of the public view, as is the case for example in most of the United States today, then the votes can be manipulated without having to cause any fraud at the voting booth. Countries such as France count all votes publicly in order to make this method of electoral fraud more difficult.

Legal means of influencing the outcome of an election such as gerrymandering (drawing voting district lines in such a way as to obtain a favorable result) or including prison inmates in a local population are also often argued to be forms of electoral fraud.

Electoral fraud is not always subtle. Booth capturing is a persistant problem in Indian democracy where thugs of one party "capture" a polling booth and stamp their votes threatening everyone.

History

History is full of notorious examples of electoral fraud, especially (and ironically) in advanced democracies where such crimes tend to be noticed, reported, and corrected. Examples include the Daley Machine in 20th Century Chicago and Tammany Hall in 19th Century New York. Although the penalties for getting caught may be severe, the rewards for succeeding are likely to be immense, encouraging perpetrators to continue their fraudulence. Also, in recent times, accusations of voter suppression are often made to counter those alleging election fraud.

Communists seized power in Poland, Romania, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia from nominally-democratic governments between 1946 and 1948 with the aid of electoral fraud and maintained formal power through rigged elections.

Countering Fraud

In countries with strong laws and effective legal systems, lawsuits can be brought against those who have allegedly committed fraud. In countries with high rates of corruption, international observers may be brought in to observe the elections.

See also

Quotes

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything." -- Joseph Stalin (possibly apocryphal -- About.com's Urban Legends and Folklore Mailbag 12/18/00)
"I can make them voting machines sing 'Home Sweet Home'." -- Earl K. Long

External links

Categories: